aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Pinski <quic_apinski@quicinc.com>2024-08-06 16:00:02 -0700
committerAndrew Pinski <quic_apinski@quicinc.com>2024-08-08 10:56:49 -0700
commit7223c64745530db102a160d5a1db4c2c8d2b9fe1 (patch)
tree18bba33acb5153560be7583718d1aaa127ab13ba /gcc
parent2c24e0568392e51a77ebdaab629d631969ce8966 (diff)
downloadgcc-7223c64745530db102a160d5a1db4c2c8d2b9fe1.zip
gcc-7223c64745530db102a160d5a1db4c2c8d2b9fe1.tar.gz
gcc-7223c64745530db102a160d5a1db4c2c8d2b9fe1.tar.bz2
aarch64/testsuite: Fix if-compare_2.c for removing vcond{,u,eq} patterns [PR116041]
For bar1 and bar2, we currently is expecting to use the bsl instruction but with slightly different register allocation inside the loop (which happens after the removal of the vcond{,u,eq} patterns), we get the bit instruction. The pattern that outputs bsl instruction will output bit and bif too depending register allocation. So let's check for bsl, bit or bif instructions instead of just bsl instruction. Tested on aarch64 both with an unmodified compiler and one which has the patch to disable these optabs. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR testsuite/116041 * gcc.target/aarch64/if-compare_2.c: Support bit and bif for both bar1 and bar2; add comment on why too. Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <quic_apinski@quicinc.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc')
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/if-compare_2.c9
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/if-compare_2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/if-compare_2.c
index 14988ab..f5a2b19 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/if-compare_2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/if-compare_2.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
typedef int v4si __attribute__ ((vector_size (16)));
+
/*
**foo1:
** cmgt v0.4s, v1.4s, v0.4s
@@ -29,11 +30,13 @@ v4si foo2 (v4si a, v4si b, v4si c, v4si d) {
}
+/* The bsl could be bit or bif depending on register
+ allocator inside the loop. */
/**
**bar1:
**...
** cmge v[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.4s
-** bsl v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b
+** (bsl|bit|bif) v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b
** and v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b
**...
*/
@@ -44,11 +47,13 @@ void bar1 (int * restrict a, int * restrict b, int * restrict c,
res[i] = ((a[i] < b[i]) & c[i]) | ((a[i] >= b[i]) & d[i]);
}
+/* The bsl could be bit or bif depending on register
+ allocator inside the loop. */
/**
**bar2:
**...
** cmge v[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.4s
-** bsl v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b
+** (bsl|bit|bif) v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b
**...
*/
void bar2 (int * restrict a, int * restrict b, int * restrict c,