diff options
author | Simon Martin <simon@nasilyan.com> | 2024-10-02 15:32:37 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Simon Martin <simon@nasilyan.com> | 2024-10-02 15:32:37 +0200 |
commit | 3a528386571fffbb41703a238aee950043af3f3c (patch) | |
tree | c52ccd903c80108e3aed4f73167bbba76ecdefd2 /gcc | |
parent | dafbfdb01559092aca6be0e31afc2b39d3fdb2dd (diff) | |
download | gcc-3a528386571fffbb41703a238aee950043af3f3c.zip gcc-3a528386571fffbb41703a238aee950043af3f3c.tar.gz gcc-3a528386571fffbb41703a238aee950043af3f3c.tar.bz2 |
c++: Fix regression introduced by r15-3796 [PR116722]
Jason pointed out that the fix I made for PR116722 via r15-3796
introduces a regression when running constexpr-dynamic10.C with
-fimplicit-constexpr.
The problem is that my change makes us leave cxx_eval_call_expression
early, and bypass the call to cxx_eval_thunk_call (through a recursive
call to cxx_eval_call_expression) that used to emit an error for that
testcase with -fimplicit-constexpr.
This patch emits the error if !ctx->quiet before bailing out because the
{con,de}structor belongs to a class with virtual bases.
PR c++/116722
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* constexpr.cc (cxx_bind_parameters_in_call): When !ctx->quiet,
emit error before bailing out due to a call to {con,de}structor
for a class with virtual bases.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc')
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/cp/constexpr.cc | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc index 5c66967..4e4df94 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc @@ -1867,6 +1867,12 @@ cxx_bind_parameters_in_call (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t, tree fun, with virtual bases. */ if (DECL_HAS_IN_CHARGE_PARM_P (fun) || DECL_HAS_VTT_PARM_P (fun)) { + if (!ctx->quiet) + { + error_at (cp_expr_loc_or_input_loc (t), + "call to non-%<constexpr%> function %qD", fun); + explain_invalid_constexpr_fn (fun); + } *non_constant_p = true; return binds; } |