re PR c++/70393 (Miscompilation: missing constructor call for static object)

	PR c++/70393
	* varasm.c (output_constructor_regular_field): Flush bitfield
	earlier.  Assert we don't want to move backwards.

	cp/
	* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_store_expression): Keep CONSTRUCTOR
	elements in field order.

	testsuite/
	* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-virtual6.C: New.

From-SVN: r234636

6 files changed, 113 insertions, 19 deletions

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 5a9b321..c58b659 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2016-03-31  Nathan Sidwell  <nathan@acm.org>
+
+	PR c++/70393
+	* varasm.c (output_constructor_regular_field): Flush bitfield
+	earlier.  Assert we don't want to move backwards.
+
 2016-03-31  Kirill Yukhin  <kirill.yukhin@intel.com>
 
 	PR target/70453
diff --git a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
index 8aad906..4a6dc51 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2016-03-31  Nathan Sidwell  <nathan@acm.org>
+
+	PR c++/70393
+	* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_store_expression): Keep CONSTRUCTOR
+	elements in field order.
+
 2016-03-31  Marek Polacek  <polacek@redhat.com>
 
 	PR c/70297
diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
index 8ea7111..ea605dc 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
@@ -2959,16 +2959,39 @@ cxx_eval_store_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t,
       else
 	{
 	  gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (index) == FIELD_DECL);
-	  for (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT idx = 0;
+
+	  /* We must keep the CONSTRUCTOR's ELTS in FIELD order.
+	     Usually we meet initializers in that order, but it is
+	     possible for base types to be placed not in program
+	     order.  */
+	  tree fields = TYPE_FIELDS (DECL_CONTEXT (index));
+	  unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT idx;
+
+	  for (idx = 0;
 	       vec_safe_iterate (CONSTRUCTOR_ELTS (*valp), idx, &cep);
-	       idx++)
-	    if (index == cep->index)
-	      break;
-	  if (!cep)
+	       idx++, fields = DECL_CHAIN (fields))
 	    {
-	      constructor_elt ce = { index, NULL_TREE };
-	      cep = vec_safe_push (CONSTRUCTOR_ELTS (*valp), ce);
+	      if (index == cep->index)
+		goto found;
+
+	      /* The field we're initializing must be on the field
+		 list.  Look to see if it is present before the
+		 field the current ELT initializes.  */
+	      for (; fields != cep->index; fields = DECL_CHAIN (fields))
+		if (index == fields)
+		  goto insert;
 	    }
+
+	  /* We fell off the end of the CONSTRUCTOR, so insert a new
+	     entry at the end.  */
+	insert:
+	  {
+	    constructor_elt ce = { index, NULL_TREE };
+
+	    vec_safe_insert (CONSTRUCTOR_ELTS (*valp), idx, ce);
+	    cep = CONSTRUCTOR_ELT (*valp, idx);
+	  }
+	found:;
 	}
       valp = &cep->value;
     }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 4cab394..f977fc8 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2016-03-31  Nathan Sidwell  <nathan@acm.org>
+
+	PR c++/70393
+	* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-virtual6.C: New.
+
 2016-03-31  Kirill Yukhin  <kirill.yukhin@intel.com>
 
 	PR target/70453
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-virtual6.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-virtual6.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f5abf2c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-virtual6.C
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+// PR c++/70393
+// { dg-do run { target c++11 } }
+
+/* 'ab' has a static initializer, but we flubbed the initializer,
+   because of B being the primary base.  */
+
+struct A
+{
+  int a = 1;
+};
+
+struct B
+{
+  B *element = (B*)2;
+
+    virtual int vfunc() = 0;
+
+    int call_element()
+    {
+      return element->vfunc();
+    }
+
+    void set_element()
+    {
+      element = this;
+    }
+};
+
+struct AB : public A, public B
+{
+    int vfunc()
+    {
+      return 0;
+    }
+};
+
+static AB ab;
+
+int main()
+{
+  if (ab.a != 1)
+    return 1;
+  if (ab.element != (void*)2)
+    return 2;
+  
+  ab.set_element();
+  return ab.call_element();
+}
+
diff --git a/gcc/varasm.c b/gcc/varasm.c
index 3a3573e..b0f2af0 100644
--- a/gcc/varasm.c
+++ b/gcc/varasm.c
@@ -4929,6 +4929,14 @@ output_constructor_regular_field (oc_local_state *local)
 
   unsigned int align2;
 
+  /* Output any buffered-up bit-fields preceding this element.  */
+  if (local->byte_buffer_in_use)
+    {
+      assemble_integer (GEN_INT (local->byte), 1, BITS_PER_UNIT, 1);
+      local->total_bytes++;
+      local->byte_buffer_in_use = false;
+    }
+
   if (local->index != NULL_TREE)
     {
       /* Perform the index calculation in modulo arithmetic but
@@ -4945,22 +4953,19 @@ output_constructor_regular_field (oc_local_state *local)
   else
     fieldpos = 0;
 
-  /* Output any buffered-up bit-fields preceding this element.  */
-  if (local->byte_buffer_in_use)
-    {
-      assemble_integer (GEN_INT (local->byte), 1, BITS_PER_UNIT, 1);
-      local->total_bytes++;
-      local->byte_buffer_in_use = false;
-    }
-
   /* Advance to offset of this element.
      Note no alignment needed in an array, since that is guaranteed
      if each element has the proper size.  */
-  if ((local->field != NULL_TREE || local->index != NULL_TREE)
-      && fieldpos > local->total_bytes)
+  if (local->field != NULL_TREE || local->index != NULL_TREE)
     {
-      assemble_zeros (fieldpos - local->total_bytes);
-      local->total_bytes = fieldpos;
+      if (fieldpos > local->total_bytes)
+	{
+	  assemble_zeros (fieldpos - local->total_bytes);
+	  local->total_bytes = fieldpos;
+	}
+      else
+	/* Must not go backwards.  */
+	gcc_assert (fieldpos == local->total_bytes);
     }
 
   /* Find the alignment of this element.  */