Check whether any statements need masking (PR 83922)

This PR is an odd case in which, due to the low optimisation level,
we enter vectorisation with:

  outer1:
    x_1 = PHI <x_3(outer2), ...>;
    ...

  inner:
    x_2 = 0;
    ...

  outer2:
    x_3 = PHI <x_2(inner)>;

These statements are tentatively treated as a double reduction by
vect_force_simple_reduction, but in the end only x_3 and x_2 are marked
as relevant.  vect_analyze_loop_operations skips over x_3, leaving the
vectorizable_reduction check to a presumed future test of x_1, which
in this case never happens.  We therefore end up vectorising x_2 only
(complete with peeling for niters!) and leave the scalar x_3 in place.

This caused a segfault in the support for fully-masked loops,
since there were no statements that needed masking.  Fixed by
checking for that.

But I think this is also a flaw in vect_analyze_loop_operations.
Outer loop vectorisation reduces the number of times that the
inner loop is executed, so it wouldn't necessarily be valid
to leave the scalar x_3 in place for all vectorisable x_2.
There's already code to forbid that when x_1 isn't present:

              /* FORNOW: we currently don't support the case that these phis
                 are not used in the outerloop (unless it is double reduction,
                 i.e., this phi is vect_reduction_def), cause this case
                 requires to actually do something here.  */

I think we need to do the same if x_1 is present but not relevant.

2018-01-19  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>

gcc/
	PR tree-optimization/83922
	* tree-vect-loop.c (vect_verify_full_masking): Return false if
	there are no statements that need masking.
	(vect_active_double_reduction_p): New function.
	(vect_analyze_loop_operations): Use it when handling phis that
	are not in the loop header.

gcc/testsuite/
	PR tree-optimization/83922
	* gcc.dg/pr83922.c: New test.

From-SVN: r256885

4 files changed, 69 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index a86ea91..c11f8c7 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,14 @@
 2018-01-19  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
 
+	PR tree-optimization/83922
+	* tree-vect-loop.c (vect_verify_full_masking): Return false if
+	there are no statements that need masking.
+	(vect_active_double_reduction_p): New function.
+	(vect_analyze_loop_operations): Use it when handling phis that
+	are not in the loop header.
+
+2018-01-19  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
+
 	PR tree-optimization/83914
 	* tree-vect-loop.c (vectorizable_induction): Don't convert
 	init_expr or apply the peeling adjustment for inductions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 44080e0..f0485d3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
 2018-01-19  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
 
+	PR tree-optimization/83922
+	* gcc.dg/pr83922.c: New test.
+
+2018-01-19  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
+
 	PR tree-optimization/83914
 	* gcc.dg/vect/pr83914.c: New test.
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr83922.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr83922.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8f99f77
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr83922.c
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+/* { dg-options "-O -ftree-vectorize" } */
+
+int j4;
+
+void
+k1 (int ak)
+{
+  while (ak < 1)
+    {
+      int ur;
+
+      for (ur = 0; ur < 2; ++ur)
+        {
+          ++j4;
+          if (j4 != 0)
+            j4 = 0;
+        }
+
+      ++ak;
+    }
+}
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
index 8b2ecf8..f75a483 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
@@ -1294,6 +1294,12 @@ vect_verify_full_masking (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo)
   struct loop *loop = LOOP_VINFO_LOOP (loop_vinfo);
   unsigned int min_ni_width;
 
+  /* Use a normal loop if there are no statements that need masking.
+     This only happens in rare degenerate cases: it means that the loop
+     has no loads, no stores, and no live-out values.  */
+  if (LOOP_VINFO_MASKS (loop_vinfo).is_empty ())
+    return false;
+
   /* Get the maximum number of iterations that is representable
      in the counter type.  */
   tree ni_type = TREE_TYPE (LOOP_VINFO_NITERSM1 (loop_vinfo));
@@ -1739,6 +1745,33 @@ vect_update_vf_for_slp (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo)
     }
 }
 
+/* Return true if STMT_INFO describes a double reduction phi and if
+   the other phi in the reduction is also relevant for vectorization.
+   This rejects cases such as:
+
+      outer1:
+	x_1 = PHI <x_3(outer2), ...>;
+	...
+
+      inner:
+	x_2 = ...;
+	...
+
+      outer2:
+	x_3 = PHI <x_2(inner)>;
+
+   if nothing in x_2 or elsewhere makes x_1 relevant.  */
+
+static bool
+vect_active_double_reduction_p (stmt_vec_info stmt_info)
+{
+  if (STMT_VINFO_DEF_TYPE (stmt_info) != vect_double_reduction_def)
+    return false;
+
+  gimple *other_phi = STMT_VINFO_REDUC_DEF (stmt_info);
+  return STMT_VINFO_RELEVANT_P (vinfo_for_stmt (other_phi));
+}
+
 /* Function vect_analyze_loop_operations.
 
    Scan the loop stmts and make sure they are all vectorizable.  */
@@ -1786,8 +1819,7 @@ vect_analyze_loop_operations (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo)
                  i.e., this phi is vect_reduction_def), cause this case
                  requires to actually do something here.  */
               if (STMT_VINFO_LIVE_P (stmt_info)
-                  && STMT_VINFO_DEF_TYPE (stmt_info)
-                     != vect_double_reduction_def)
+		  && !vect_active_double_reduction_p (stmt_info))
                 {
                   if (dump_enabled_p ())
 		    dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location,