diff options
author | Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com> | 2022-03-28 18:19:20 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com> | 2022-03-29 14:10:37 -0400 |
commit | d886a5248e66ab911391af18bf955beb87ee8461 (patch) | |
tree | f47537490d8af1be79da3e2789de16eb383f891e /gcc/tree.h | |
parent | 89976d082488b3a7dc7520b980f854ce83043d38 (diff) | |
download | gcc-d886a5248e66ab911391af18bf955beb87ee8461.zip gcc-d886a5248e66ab911391af18bf955beb87ee8461.tar.gz gcc-d886a5248e66ab911391af18bf955beb87ee8461.tar.bz2 |
gimple: Wrong -Wimplicit-fallthrough with if(1) [PR103597]
This patch fixes a wrong -Wimplicit-fallthrough warning for
case 0:
if (1) // wrong may fallthrough
return 0;
case 1:
which in .gimple looks like
<D.1981>: // case 0
if (1 != 0) goto <D.1985>; else goto <D.1986>;
<D.1985>:
D.1987 = 0;
// predicted unlikely by early return (on trees) predictor.
return D.1987;
<D.1986>: // dead
<D.1982>: // case 1
and the warning thinks that <D.1986>: falls through to <D.1982>:. It
does not know that <D.1986> is effectively a dead label, only reachable
through fallthrough from previous instructions, never jumped to. To
that effect, Jakub introduced UNUSED_LABEL_P, which is set on such dead
labels.
collect_fallthrough_labels has code to deal with cases like
case 2:
if (e != 10)
i++; // this may fallthru, warn
else
return 44;
case 3:
which collects labels that may fall through. Here it sees the "goto <D.1990>;"
at the end of the then branch and so when the warning reaches
...
<D.1990>: // from if-then
<D.1984>: // case 3
it knows it should warn about the possible fallthrough. But an UNUSED_LABEL_P
is not a label that can fallthrough like that, so it should ignore those.
However, we still want to warn about this:
case 0:
if (1)
n++; // falls through
case 1:
so collect_fallthrough_labels needs to return the "n = n + 1;" statement, rather
than the dead label.
Co-authored-by: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR middle-end/103597
gcc/ChangeLog:
* gimplify.cc (collect_fallthrough_labels): Don't push UNUSED_LABEL_Ps
into labels. Maybe set prev to the statement preceding UNUSED_LABEL_P.
(gimplify_cond_expr): Set UNUSED_LABEL_P.
* tree.h (UNUSED_LABEL_P): New.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* c-c++-common/Wimplicit-fallthrough-39.c: New test.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/tree.h')
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/tree.h | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -787,6 +787,12 @@ extern void omp_clause_range_check_failed (const_tree, const char *, int, #define SWITCH_BREAK_LABEL_P(NODE) \ (LABEL_DECL_CHECK (NODE)->base.protected_flag) +/* Set on label that is known not to be jumped to, it can be only + reached by falling through from previous statements. + This is used to implement -Wimplicit-fallthrough. */ +#define UNUSED_LABEL_P(NODE) \ + (LABEL_DECL_CHECK (NODE)->base.default_def_flag) + /* Nonzero means this expression is volatile in the C sense: its address should be of type `volatile WHATEVER *'. In other words, the declared item is volatile qualified. |