diff options
author | Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> | 2021-04-15 13:38:54 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> | 2021-04-15 14:06:21 -0400 |
commit | 2efbbba16a0630fac8cadcd6d9e0ffaabfadb79f (patch) | |
tree | 9cf8ffec9561a9afb453780ebfc0ca8e5756f6c9 /gcc/tree-vect-loop.c | |
parent | a25590f29d07a88f6bf1b2c1ab0e4e012725db98 (diff) | |
download | gcc-2efbbba16a0630fac8cadcd6d9e0ffaabfadb79f.zip gcc-2efbbba16a0630fac8cadcd6d9e0ffaabfadb79f.tar.gz gcc-2efbbba16a0630fac8cadcd6d9e0ffaabfadb79f.tar.bz2 |
c++: noexcept error recursion [PR100101]
Here instantiating the noexcept-specifier for bar<void>() means
instantiating A<void>::value, which complains about the conversion from 0 to
int* in the default argument of foo. Since my patch for PR99583, printing
the error context involves looking at C<void>::type, which again wants to
instantiate A<void>::value, which breaks. For now at least, let's break
this recursion by avoiding looking into the noexcept-specifier in
find_typenames, and limit that to just the uses_parameter_packs case that
PR99583 cares about.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/100101
PR c++/99583
* pt.c (find_parameter_packs_r) [FUNCTION_TYPE]: Walk into
TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS here.
* tree.c (cp_walk_subtrees): Not here.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/100101
* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept67.C: New test.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/tree-vect-loop.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions