aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>2021-07-15 18:53:20 +0200
committerJakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>2021-07-15 18:53:20 +0200
commit7094a69bd62a14dfa311eaa2fea468f221c7c9f3 (patch)
treee035f180ebf7d79e731b6efed4f7e0efebd37a4d /gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c
parentb25edf6e6feeadc6a5aa337b8c725786227162dd (diff)
downloadgcc-7094a69bd62a14dfa311eaa2fea468f221c7c9f3.zip
gcc-7094a69bd62a14dfa311eaa2fea468f221c7c9f3.tar.gz
gcc-7094a69bd62a14dfa311eaa2fea468f221c7c9f3.tar.bz2
c++: Optimize away NULLPTR_TYPE comparisons [PR101443]
Comparisons of NULLPTR_TYPE operands cause all kinds of problems in the middle-end and in fold-const.c, various optimizations assume that if they see e.g. a non-equality comparison with one of the operands being INTEGER_CST and it is not INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (which has TYPE_{MIN,MAX}_VALUE), they can build_int_cst (type, 1) to find a successor. The following patch fixes it by making sure they don't appear in the IL, optimize them away at cp_fold time as all can be folded. Though, I've just noticed that clang++ rejects the non-equality comparisons instead, foo () > 0 with invalid operands to binary expression ('decltype(nullptr)' (aka 'nullptr_t') and 'int') and foo () > nullptr with invalid operands to binary expression ('decltype(nullptr)' (aka 'nullptr_t') and 'nullptr_t') Shall we reject those too, in addition or instead of parts of this patch? If so, wouldn't this patch be still useful for backports, I bet we don't want to start reject it on the release branches when we used to accept it. 2021-07-15 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR c++/101443 * cp-gimplify.c (cp_fold): For comparisons with NULLPTR_TYPE operands, fold them right away to true or false. * g++.dg/cpp0x/nullptr46.C: New test.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions