diff options
author | Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com> | 2021-07-07 20:02:18 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com> | 2021-07-08 17:38:49 -0400 |
commit | dee00bf6894be0cabb8f263c993357a6f8444f8b (patch) | |
tree | 28900c25657b1c8193f3d6491c7b58a5c57806b2 /gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.c | |
parent | b14ac7b29c9a05c94f62fe065c219bbaa83653db (diff) | |
download | gcc-dee00bf6894be0cabb8f263c993357a6f8444f8b.zip gcc-dee00bf6894be0cabb8f263c993357a6f8444f8b.tar.gz gcc-dee00bf6894be0cabb8f263c993357a6f8444f8b.tar.bz2 |
c++: Fix noexcept with unevaluated operand [PR101087]
It sounds plausible that this assert
int f();
static_assert(noexcept(sizeof(f())));
should pass: sizeof produces a std::size_t and its operand is not
evaluated, so it can't throw. noexcept should only evaluate to
false for potentially evaluated operands. Therefore I think that
check_noexcept_r shouldn't walk into operands of sizeof/decltype/
alignof/typeof.
PR c++/101087
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* cp-tree.h (unevaluated_p): New.
* except.c (check_noexcept_r): Use it. Don't walk into
unevaluated operands.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept70.C: New test.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions