diff options
author | Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org> | 2017-05-04 11:37:05 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org> | 2017-05-04 11:37:05 +0000 |
commit | 3862ef76c66219fd7adbbd6e3884bc9c1ba9c606 (patch) | |
tree | 9e4572707089e2b42a80ecb24d4d3b00ae89d8a3 /gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.c | |
parent | 6d0da573d22e446f7740f6340131b11f605715bc (diff) | |
download | gcc-3862ef76c66219fd7adbbd6e3884bc9c1ba9c606.zip gcc-3862ef76c66219fd7adbbd6e3884bc9c1ba9c606.tar.gz gcc-3862ef76c66219fd7adbbd6e3884bc9c1ba9c606.tar.bz2 |
Cap niter_for_unrolled_loop to upper bound
For the reasons explained in PR77536, niter_for_unrolled_loop assumes 5
iterations in the absence of profiling information, although it doesn't
increase beyond the estimate for the original loop. This left a hole in
which the new estimate could be less than the old one but still greater
than the limit imposed by CEIL (nb_iterations_upper_bound, unroll factor).
2017-05-04 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
gcc/
* tree-ssa-loop-manip.c (niter_for_unrolled_loop): Add commentary
to explain the use of truncating division. Cap the number of
iterations to the maximum given by nb_iterations_upper_bound,
if defined.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-profile-1.c: New test.
From-SVN: r247591
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.c')
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.c index 70d1f844..d3a57f1 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.c +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.c @@ -1104,6 +1104,9 @@ niter_for_unrolled_loop (struct loop *loop, unsigned factor) gcc_assert (factor != 0); bool profile_p = false; gcov_type est_niter = expected_loop_iterations_unbounded (loop, &profile_p); + /* Note that this is really CEIL (est_niter + 1, factor) - 1, where the + "+ 1" converts latch iterations to loop iterations and the "- 1" + converts back. */ gcov_type new_est_niter = est_niter / factor; /* Without profile feedback, loops for which we do not know a better estimate @@ -1120,6 +1123,15 @@ niter_for_unrolled_loop (struct loop *loop, unsigned factor) new_est_niter = 5; } + if (loop->any_upper_bound) + { + /* As above, this is really CEIL (upper_bound + 1, factor) - 1. */ + widest_int bound = wi::udiv_floor (loop->nb_iterations_upper_bound, + factor); + if (wi::ltu_p (bound, new_est_niter)) + new_est_niter = bound.to_uhwi (); + } + return new_est_niter; } |