aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRichard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>2017-05-04 11:37:05 +0000
committerRichard Sandiford <rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org>2017-05-04 11:37:05 +0000
commit3862ef76c66219fd7adbbd6e3884bc9c1ba9c606 (patch)
tree9e4572707089e2b42a80ecb24d4d3b00ae89d8a3 /gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.c
parent6d0da573d22e446f7740f6340131b11f605715bc (diff)
downloadgcc-3862ef76c66219fd7adbbd6e3884bc9c1ba9c606.zip
gcc-3862ef76c66219fd7adbbd6e3884bc9c1ba9c606.tar.gz
gcc-3862ef76c66219fd7adbbd6e3884bc9c1ba9c606.tar.bz2
Cap niter_for_unrolled_loop to upper bound
For the reasons explained in PR77536, niter_for_unrolled_loop assumes 5 iterations in the absence of profiling information, although it doesn't increase beyond the estimate for the original loop. This left a hole in which the new estimate could be less than the old one but still greater than the limit imposed by CEIL (nb_iterations_upper_bound, unroll factor). 2017-05-04 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org> gcc/ * tree-ssa-loop-manip.c (niter_for_unrolled_loop): Add commentary to explain the use of truncating division. Cap the number of iterations to the maximum given by nb_iterations_upper_bound, if defined. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.dg/vect/vect-profile-1.c: New test. From-SVN: r247591
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.c')
-rw-r--r--gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.c12
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.c
index 70d1f844..d3a57f1 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.c
@@ -1104,6 +1104,9 @@ niter_for_unrolled_loop (struct loop *loop, unsigned factor)
gcc_assert (factor != 0);
bool profile_p = false;
gcov_type est_niter = expected_loop_iterations_unbounded (loop, &profile_p);
+ /* Note that this is really CEIL (est_niter + 1, factor) - 1, where the
+ "+ 1" converts latch iterations to loop iterations and the "- 1"
+ converts back. */
gcov_type new_est_niter = est_niter / factor;
/* Without profile feedback, loops for which we do not know a better estimate
@@ -1120,6 +1123,15 @@ niter_for_unrolled_loop (struct loop *loop, unsigned factor)
new_est_niter = 5;
}
+ if (loop->any_upper_bound)
+ {
+ /* As above, this is really CEIL (upper_bound + 1, factor) - 1. */
+ widest_int bound = wi::udiv_floor (loop->nb_iterations_upper_bound,
+ factor);
+ if (wi::ltu_p (bound, new_est_niter))
+ new_est_niter = bound.to_uhwi ();
+ }
+
return new_est_niter;
}