aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/tree-sra.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMartin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>2020-02-19 11:08:40 +0100
committerMartin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>2020-02-19 11:08:40 +0100
commit665c5bad168ab63629b29ed2ce08ed042c088dc2 (patch)
treeecb4038880ce3d049ab4985c927936c0b7af96ee /gcc/tree-sra.c
parent8d1a1cb1b816381bf60cb1211c93b8eba1fe1472 (diff)
downloadgcc-665c5bad168ab63629b29ed2ce08ed042c088dc2.zip
gcc-665c5bad168ab63629b29ed2ce08ed042c088dc2.tar.gz
gcc-665c5bad168ab63629b29ed2ce08ed042c088dc2.tar.bz2
sra: Avoid totally scalarizing overallping field_decls (PR 93667)
[[no_unique_address]] C++ attribute can cause two fields of a RECORD_TYPE overlap, which currently confuses the totally scalarizing code into creating invalid access tree. For GCC 10, I'd like to simply disable total scalarization of types where this happens. For GCC 11 I'll write down a TODO item to enable total scalarization of cases like this where the problematic fields are basically empty - despite having a non-zero size - i.e. when they are just RECORD_TYPEs without any data fields. 2020-02-19 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz> gcc/ PR tree-optimization/93667 * tree-sra.c (scalarizable_type_p): Return false if record fields do not follow wach other. gcc/testsuite/ PR tree-optimization/93667 * g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr93667.C: New test.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/tree-sra.c')
-rw-r--r--gcc/tree-sra.c14
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/tree-sra.c b/gcc/tree-sra.c
index 0cfac0a..4c7d651 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-sra.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-sra.c
@@ -958,6 +958,9 @@ scalarizable_type_p (tree type, bool const_decl)
if (type_contains_placeholder_p (type))
return false;
+ bool have_predecessor_field = false;
+ HOST_WIDE_INT prev_pos = 0;
+
switch (TREE_CODE (type))
{
case RECORD_TYPE:
@@ -966,6 +969,17 @@ scalarizable_type_p (tree type, bool const_decl)
{
tree ft = TREE_TYPE (fld);
+ if (zerop (DECL_SIZE (fld)))
+ continue;
+
+ HOST_WIDE_INT pos = int_bit_position (fld);
+ if (have_predecessor_field
+ && pos <= prev_pos)
+ return false;
+
+ have_predecessor_field = true;
+ prev_pos = pos;
+
if (DECL_BIT_FIELD (fld))
return false;