diff options
author | Joseph Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> | 2000-11-20 19:06:19 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joseph Myers <jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> | 2000-11-20 19:06:19 +0000 |
commit | 1d7ff272c796a4fa6e25fef75aaa49d7d0a73f72 (patch) | |
tree | 97024f1a070b7d7df63683cd4f106a692baa01d4 /gcc/testsuite | |
parent | 029a4f4dea9d93d36a058b4dd5cc1c17fa7bf2a2 (diff) | |
download | gcc-1d7ff272c796a4fa6e25fef75aaa49d7d0a73f72.zip gcc-1d7ff272c796a4fa6e25fef75aaa49d7d0a73f72.tar.gz gcc-1d7ff272c796a4fa6e25fef75aaa49d7d0a73f72.tar.bz2 |
c-typeck.c (build_conditional_expr): When merging type qualifiers for conditional expressions between a pointer and...
* c-typeck.c (build_conditional_expr): When merging type
qualifiers for conditional expressions between a pointer and a
pointer to a void type, merge the qualifiers on the target types
rather than the pointer type. Remove obsolete conditioned out
code.
testsuite:
* gcc.dg/c99-condexpr-1.c: New test.
From-SVN: r37589
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/testsuite')
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-condexpr-1.c | 70 |
2 files changed, 74 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index 5df57ff..6fb01f8 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2000-11-20 Joseph S. Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> + + * gcc.dg/c99-condexpr-1.c: New test. + 2000-11-20 Neil Booth <neilb@earthling.net> * gcc.dg/cpp/macsyntx.c: Use correct command line option. diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-condexpr-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-condexpr-1.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..69d4250 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-condexpr-1.c @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ +/* Test for types of conditional expressions. */ +/* Origin: Joseph Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> */ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-std=iso9899:1999 -pedantic-errors" } */ + +/* Notes: + + (a) The rules are the same in both C standard versions, but C99 also + gives us the "restrict" qualifier to play with. + + (b) Within the C standard, the value of a conditional expression can't + have qualified type - but nor can this be detected. Because of GCC's + extended lvalues, the value may in GCC have qualified type if the + arguments do. So don't use the following macro with arguments of + qualified type. + +*/ + +/* Assertion that the type of a conditional expression between E1 and E2 + is T. Checks the expression both ways round. */ +#define ASSERT_COND_TYPE(E1, E2, T) \ + do { \ + typedef T type; \ + typedef type **typepp; \ + typedef __typeof(0 ? (E1) : (E2)) ctype; \ + typedef __typeof(0 ? (E2) : (E1)) ctype2; \ + typedef ctype **ctypepp; \ + typedef ctype2 **ctype2pp; \ + typepp x = 0; \ + ctypepp y = 0; \ + ctype2pp z = 0; \ + x = y; \ + x = z; \ + } while (0) + +void +foo (void) +{ + const void *c_vp; + void *vp; + const int *c_ip; + volatile int *v_ip; + int *ip; + const char *c_cp; + int *restrict *r_ipp; + typedef void (*fpt)(void); + fpt fp; + signed char sc; + struct s { int p; } st; + union u { int p; } un; + /* Arithmetic type. */ + ASSERT_COND_TYPE (sc, sc, int); + /* Structure and union. */ + ASSERT_COND_TYPE (st, st, struct s); + ASSERT_COND_TYPE (un, un, union u); + /* Void. */ + ASSERT_COND_TYPE ((void)0, (void)1, void); + /* Pointers: examples from 6.5.15 paragraph 8. */ + ASSERT_COND_TYPE (c_vp, c_ip, const void *); + ASSERT_COND_TYPE (v_ip, 0, volatile int *); + ASSERT_COND_TYPE (c_ip, v_ip, const volatile int *); + ASSERT_COND_TYPE (vp, c_cp, const void *); + ASSERT_COND_TYPE (ip, c_ip, const int *); + ASSERT_COND_TYPE (vp, ip, void *); + /* Null pointer constants. */ + ASSERT_COND_TYPE (v_ip, (void *)0, volatile int *); + ASSERT_COND_TYPE (r_ipp, (void *)0, int *restrict *); + ASSERT_COND_TYPE (fp, 0, fpt); + ASSERT_COND_TYPE (fp, (void *)0, fpt); +} |