aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/system.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>2024-03-05 13:33:10 -0500
committerMarek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>2024-03-06 11:47:10 -0500
commitdc6c3bfb59baab28b998e18396c06087b6d9b0ed (patch)
tree0c23621cbd31456e673e056305fddaea69a36690 /gcc/system.h
parente772c0c05c36d0b0539effb4256be67bbedd77fb (diff)
downloadgcc-dc6c3bfb59baab28b998e18396c06087b6d9b0ed.zip
gcc-dc6c3bfb59baab28b998e18396c06087b6d9b0ed.tar.gz
gcc-dc6c3bfb59baab28b998e18396c06087b6d9b0ed.tar.bz2
c++: ICE with noexcept and local specialization [PR114114]
Here we ICE because we call register_local_specialization while local_specializations is null, so local_specializations->put (); crashes on null this. It's null since maybe_instantiate_noexcept calls push_to_top_level which creates a new scope. Normally, I would have guessed that we need a new local_specialization_stack. But here we're dealing with an operand of a noexcept, which is an unevaluated operand, and those aren't registered in the hash map. maybe_instantiate_noexcept wasn't signalling that it's substituting an unevaluated operand though. PR c++/114114 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * pt.cc (maybe_instantiate_noexcept): Save/restore cp_unevaluated_operand, c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings, and cp_noexcept_operand around the tsubst_expr call. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept84.C: New test.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/system.h')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions