diff options
author | Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> | 2023-01-04 18:42:31 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> | 2023-01-04 18:42:31 +0100 |
commit | fc349931adcf1024ee95e0a0cd98cf4a41996093 (patch) | |
tree | 0f70461ce5caaf86a2fb26e7babe38dd537b4a0d /gcc/rust/resolve/rust-ast-resolve-expr.cc | |
parent | edc038863d88ef0fe7c3ffb3703a9d2b3a17f0a9 (diff) | |
download | gcc-fc349931adcf1024ee95e0a0cd98cf4a41996093.zip gcc-fc349931adcf1024ee95e0a0cd98cf4a41996093.tar.gz gcc-fc349931adcf1024ee95e0a0cd98cf4a41996093.tar.bz2 |
c++: Error recovery in merge_default_template_args [PR108206]
We ICE on the following testcase during error recovery, both new_parm
and old_parm are error_mark_node, the ICE is on
error ("redefinition of default argument for %q+#D", new_parm);
inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (old_parm),
"original definition appeared here");
where we don't print anything useful for new_parm and ICE trying to
access DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION of old_parm. I think we shouldn't diagnose
anything when either of the parms is erroneous, GCC 11 before
merge_default_template_args has been added was doing
if (TREE_VEC_ELT (tmpl_parms, i) == error_mark_node
|| TREE_VEC_ELT (parms, i) == error_mark_node)
continue;
tmpl_parm = TREE_VALUE (TREE_VEC_ELT (tmpl_parms, i));
if (error_operand_p (tmpl_parm))
return false;
in redeclare_class_template.
2023-01-04 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/108206
* decl.cc (merge_default_template_args): Return false if either
new_parm or old_parm are erroneous.
* g++.dg/template/pr108206.C: New test.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/rust/resolve/rust-ast-resolve-expr.cc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions