aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/rust/backend/rust-compile-expr.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPhilip Herron <philip.herron@embecosm.com>2022-05-06 12:22:46 +0100
committerPhilip Herron <philip.herron@embecosm.com>2022-05-06 16:34:13 +0100
commit224647d24a3fe0411a46ac97d76e06fe2156a9fc (patch)
treedcc8637223ee6d471fe84e39b4336b4e419fd84f /gcc/rust/backend/rust-compile-expr.h
parent9ea940e4dcabbf99fbb44c125a0af7cf82e48146 (diff)
downloadgcc-224647d24a3fe0411a46ac97d76e06fe2156a9fc.zip
gcc-224647d24a3fe0411a46ac97d76e06fe2156a9fc.tar.gz
gcc-224647d24a3fe0411a46ac97d76e06fe2156a9fc.tar.bz2
Ensure the coercion sites are applied correctly on unions
When we construct a union, we were wrongly compiling the constructor without taking into account the associated union index. This means we ended up trying to coerce the wrong field which was always zero here which resulted in a silent failure by returning error mark node. The offending test case was: gcc/testsuite/execute/torture/slice1.rs
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/rust/backend/rust-compile-expr.h')
-rw-r--r--gcc/rust/backend/rust-compile-expr.h48
1 files changed, 41 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/rust/backend/rust-compile-expr.h b/gcc/rust/backend/rust-compile-expr.h
index bb81d4e..79d9e57 100644
--- a/gcc/rust/backend/rust-compile-expr.h
+++ b/gcc/rust/backend/rust-compile-expr.h
@@ -419,18 +419,19 @@ public:
// compile it
tree compiled_adt_type = TyTyResolveCompile::compile (ctx, tyty);
- // this assumes all fields are in order from type resolution and if a base
- // struct was specified those fields are filed via accesors
std::vector<tree> arguments;
- for (size_t i = 0; i < struct_expr.get_fields ().size (); i++)
+ if (adt->is_union ())
{
+ rust_assert (struct_expr.get_fields ().size () == 1);
+
// assignments are coercion sites so lets convert the rvalue if
// necessary
- auto respective_field = variant->get_field_at_index (i);
+ auto respective_field
+ = variant->get_field_at_index (union_disriminator);
auto expected = respective_field->get_field_type ();
// process arguments
- auto &argument = struct_expr.get_fields ().at (i);
+ auto &argument = struct_expr.get_fields ().at (0);
auto lvalue_locus
= ctx->get_mappings ()->lookup_location (expected->get_ty_ref ());
auto rvalue_locus = argument->get_locus ();
@@ -440,8 +441,6 @@ public:
bool ok = ctx->get_tyctx ()->lookup_type (
argument->get_mappings ().get_hirid (), &actual);
- // coerce it if required/possible see
- // compile/torture/struct_base_init_1.rs
if (ok)
{
rvalue = coercion_site (rvalue, actual, expected, lvalue_locus,
@@ -451,6 +450,41 @@ public:
// add it to the list
arguments.push_back (rvalue);
}
+ else
+ {
+ // this assumes all fields are in order from type resolution and if a
+ // base struct was specified those fields are filed via accesors
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < struct_expr.get_fields ().size (); i++)
+ {
+ // assignments are coercion sites so lets convert the rvalue if
+ // necessary
+ auto respective_field = variant->get_field_at_index (i);
+ auto expected = respective_field->get_field_type ();
+
+ // process arguments
+ auto &argument = struct_expr.get_fields ().at (i);
+ auto lvalue_locus
+ = ctx->get_mappings ()->lookup_location (expected->get_ty_ref ());
+ auto rvalue_locus = argument->get_locus ();
+ auto rvalue
+ = CompileStructExprField::Compile (argument.get (), ctx);
+
+ TyTy::BaseType *actual = nullptr;
+ bool ok = ctx->get_tyctx ()->lookup_type (
+ argument->get_mappings ().get_hirid (), &actual);
+
+ // coerce it if required/possible see
+ // compile/torture/struct_base_init_1.rs
+ if (ok)
+ {
+ rvalue = coercion_site (rvalue, actual, expected, lvalue_locus,
+ rvalue_locus);
+ }
+
+ // add it to the list
+ arguments.push_back (rvalue);
+ }
+ }
// the constructor depends on whether this is actually an enum or not if
// its an enum we need to setup the discriminator