diff options
| author | Yannick Moy <moy@adacore.com> | 2018-05-30 08:58:17 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Pierre-Marie de Rodat <pmderodat@gcc.gnu.org> | 2018-05-30 08:58:17 +0000 |
| commit | f2a3c2fa828ced9f08597def430b3149ff9a4961 (patch) | |
| tree | dff76c55c12e1f6c6799455a702662f10746d54e /gcc/lto-wrapper.c | |
| parent | efa760f0ca2f45209525de0e9b6939351e1a0072 (diff) | |
| download | gcc-f2a3c2fa828ced9f08597def430b3149ff9a4961.zip gcc-f2a3c2fa828ced9f08597def430b3149ff9a4961.tar.gz gcc-f2a3c2fa828ced9f08597def430b3149ff9a4961.tar.bz2 | |
[Ada] Correctly ignore Assertion_Policy in modes CodePeer and GNATprove
In the modes for static analysis with CodePeer or formal verification with
GNATprove, the value of Assertion_Policy for a given policy is ignored if
it's not Disable, as CodePeer/GNATprove are meant to check assertions even
when not enabled at run time. This was not done consistently, which could
lead to spurious errors on policy mismatch on ghost code inside assertions.
There is no impact on compilation.
2018-05-30 Yannick Moy <moy@adacore.com>
gcc/ada/
* sem_util.adb (Policy_In_Effect): Take into account CodePeer and
GNATprove modes.
From-SVN: r260943
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/lto-wrapper.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions