diff options
author | Sebastian Pop <s.pop@samsung.com> | 2015-10-01 15:17:58 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sebastian Pop <spop@gcc.gnu.org> | 2015-10-01 15:17:58 +0000 |
commit | 95ad24179723a91622852711b74ee3dd95657ffe (patch) | |
tree | 1aef56baeb80db4ce76b5b5c6737e4032b43b5dc /gcc/graphite-poly.c | |
parent | cf72400ff386816898a63d44045e3b2d18847872 (diff) | |
download | gcc-95ad24179723a91622852711b74ee3dd95657ffe.zip gcc-95ad24179723a91622852711b74ee3dd95657ffe.tar.gz gcc-95ad24179723a91622852711b74ee3dd95657ffe.tar.bz2 |
call scev analysis in scop-detection as in sese-to-poly
Before our rewrite of the scop detection, we used to not have a valid SESE
region under hand, and so we used to do more ad-hoc analysis of data references
by trying to prove that at all levels of a loop nest the data references would
be still valid.
Now that we have a valid SESE region, we can call the scev analysis in the same
way on the same computed loop nest in the scop-detection as in the sese-to-poly.
Next step will be to cache the data references analyzed in the scop detection
and not compute the same info in sese-to-poly.
The patch fixes block-1.f90 that used to ICE on x86_64-linux when compiled with
-m32. Patch passed bootstrap with BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -O2 -fgraphite-identity
-floop-nest-optimize" and check on x86_64-linux using ISL-0.15.
2015-09-28 Sebastian Pop <s.pop@samsung.com>
Aditya Kumar <aditya.k7@samsung.com>
PR tree-optimization/67754
* graphite-scop-detection.c (stmt_has_simple_data_refs_p): Call
scev analysis on the same loop nest as analyze_drs_in_stmts.
* graphite-sese-to-poly.c (outermost_loop_in_sese_1): Moved and renamed...
(try_generate_gimple_bb): Call outermost_loop_in_sese.
(analyze_drs_in_stmts): Same.
* sese.c (outermost_loop_in_sese): ...here.
Co-Authored-By: Aditya Kumar <aditya.k7@samsung.com>
From-SVN: r228347
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/graphite-poly.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions