aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/gimplify.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>2019-03-07 20:46:11 +0100
committerJakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>2019-03-07 20:46:11 +0100
commit90a0bf4e029b1ff3d7e7dfc6f98da88356587959 (patch)
tree02abd3b5296ff04e5f4777a2bd13cdb03d76c567 /gcc/gimplify.c
parent459d21c6cffb2c74d2644e21db372ba8a0c27eb6 (diff)
downloadgcc-90a0bf4e029b1ff3d7e7dfc6f98da88356587959.zip
gcc-90a0bf4e029b1ff3d7e7dfc6f98da88356587959.tar.gz
gcc-90a0bf4e029b1ff3d7e7dfc6f98da88356587959.tar.bz2
re PR translation/79999 (possible typo in gimplify.c: depend(sink:))
PR translation/79999 * gimplify.c (gimplify_omp_ordered): Reword diagnostics to talk about depend clause with source (or sink) modifier. * omp-expand.c (expand_omp_ordered_sink): Likewise. * c-c++-common/gomp/doacross-1.c: Adjust expected diagnostics. * c-c++-common/gomp/doacross-3.c: New test. From-SVN: r269468
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/gimplify.c')
-rw-r--r--gcc/gimplify.c13
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/gimplify.c b/gcc/gimplify.c
index fa85b1c..6d7a314 100644
--- a/gcc/gimplify.c
+++ b/gcc/gimplify.c
@@ -12145,8 +12145,8 @@ gimplify_omp_ordered (tree expr, gimple_seq body)
if (!fail && i != gimplify_omp_ctxp->loop_iter_var.length () / 2)
{
error_at (OMP_CLAUSE_LOCATION (c),
- "number of variables in %<depend(sink)%> "
- "clause does not match number of "
+ "number of variables in %<depend%> clause with "
+ "%<sink%> modifier does not match number of "
"iteration variables");
failures++;
}
@@ -12158,8 +12158,8 @@ gimplify_omp_ordered (tree expr, gimple_seq body)
if (source_c)
{
error_at (OMP_CLAUSE_LOCATION (c),
- "more than one %<depend(source)%> clause on an "
- "%<ordered%> construct");
+ "more than one %<depend%> clause with %<source%> "
+ "modifier on an %<ordered%> construct");
failures++;
}
else
@@ -12169,8 +12169,9 @@ gimplify_omp_ordered (tree expr, gimple_seq body)
if (source_c && sink_c)
{
error_at (OMP_CLAUSE_LOCATION (source_c),
- "%<depend(source)%> clause specified together with "
- "%<depend(sink:)%> clauses on the same construct");
+ "%<depend%> clause with %<source%> modifier specified "
+ "together with %<depend%> clauses with %<sink%> modifier "
+ "on the same construct");
failures++;
}