diff options
author | Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com> | 2023-03-06 18:06:39 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com> | 2023-03-07 10:13:53 -0500 |
commit | e4692319fd5fc7d740436e8bb338f44cb8df6c58 (patch) | |
tree | 5b6a208abfe92c5d9bfa244c80c2e3dd830f5031 /gcc/gimple-array-bounds.cc | |
parent | e09bc034d1b4d692b409fa5af52ae34480a6f4dc (diff) | |
download | gcc-e4692319fd5fc7d740436e8bb338f44cb8df6c58.zip gcc-e4692319fd5fc7d740436e8bb338f44cb8df6c58.tar.gz gcc-e4692319fd5fc7d740436e8bb338f44cb8df6c58.tar.bz2 |
c++: noexcept and copy elision [PR109030]
When processing a noexcept, constructors aren't elided: build_over_call
has
/* It's unsafe to elide the constructor when handling
a noexcept-expression, it may evaluate to the wrong
value (c++/53025). */
&& (force_elide || cp_noexcept_operand == 0))
so the assert I added recently needs to be relaxed a little bit.
PR c++/109030
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* constexpr.cc (cxx_eval_call_expression): Relax assert.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept77.C: New test.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/gimple-array-bounds.cc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions