diff options
author | Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr> | 2020-08-05 16:45:33 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr> | 2020-08-05 16:45:33 +0200 |
commit | 229752afe3156a3990dacaedb94c76846cebf132 (patch) | |
tree | a0e9d74627c6fbfe083b2f8df55a1acaa5538030 /gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.c | |
parent | fe1a26429038d7cd17abc53f96a6f3e2639b605f (diff) | |
download | gcc-229752afe3156a3990dacaedb94c76846cebf132.zip gcc-229752afe3156a3990dacaedb94c76846cebf132.tar.gz gcc-229752afe3156a3990dacaedb94c76846cebf132.tar.bz2 |
VEC_COND_EXPR optimizations
When vector comparisons were forced to use vec_cond_expr, we lost a number of optimizations (my fault for not adding enough testcases to
prevent that). This patch tries to unwrap vec_cond_expr a bit so some optimizations can still happen.
I wasn't planning to add all those transformations together, but adding one caused a regression, whose fix introduced a second regression,
etc.
Restricting to constant folding would not be sufficient, we also need at least things like X|0 or X&X. The transformations are quite
conservative with :s and folding only if everything simplifies, we may want to relax this later. And of course we are going to miss things
like a?b:c + a?c:b -> b+c.
In terms of number of operations, some transformations turning 2 VEC_COND_EXPR into VEC_COND_EXPR + BIT_IOR_EXPR + BIT_NOT_EXPR might not look
like a gain... I expect the bit_not disappears in most cases, and VEC_COND_EXPR looks more costly than a simpler BIT_IOR_EXPR.
2020-08-05 Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr>
PR tree-optimization/95906
PR target/70314
* match.pd ((c ? a : b) op d, (c ? a : b) op (c ? d : e),
(v ? w : 0) ? a : b, c1 ? c2 ? a : b : b): New transformations.
(op (c ? a : b)): Update to match the new transformations.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/andnot-2.c: New file.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr95906.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr70314.c: Likewise.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions