ada: Fix unsupported dispatching constructor call

Add dummy build-in-place parameters when a BIP function does not
require the BIP parameters but it is a dispatching operation that
inherited them.

gcc/ada/

	* einfo-utils.adb (Underlying_Type): Protect recursion call
	against non-available attribute Etype.
	* einfo.ads (Protected_Subprogram): Fix typo in documentation.
	* exp_ch3.adb (BIP_Function_Call_Id): New subprogram.
	(Expand_N_Object_Declaration): Improve code that evaluates if the
	object is initialized with a BIP function call.
	* exp_ch6.adb (Is_True_Build_In_Place_Function_Call): New
	subprogram.
	(Add_Task_Actuals_To_Build_In_Place_Call): Add dummy actuals if
	the function does not require the BIP task actuals but it is a
	dispatching operation that inherited them.
	(Build_In_Place_Formal): Improve code to avoid never-ending loop
	if the BIP formal is not found.
	(Add_Dummy_Build_In_Place_Actuals): New subprogram.
	(Expand_Call_Helper): Add calls to
	Add_Dummy_Build_In_Place_Actuals.
	(Expand_N_Extended_Return_Statement): Adjust assertion.
	(Expand_Simple_Function_Return): Adjust assertion.
	(Make_Build_In_Place_Call_In_Allocator): No action needed if the
	called function inherited the BIP extra formals but it is not a
	true BIP function.
	(Make_Build_In_Place_Call_In_Assignment): Ditto.
	* exp_intr.adb (Expand_Dispatching_Constructor_Call): Remove code
	reporting unsupported case (since this patch adds support for it).
	* sem_ch6.adb (Analyze_Subprogram_Body_Helper): Adding assertion
	to ensure matching of BIP formals when setting the
	Protected_Formal field of a protected subprogram to reference the
	corresponding extra formal of the subprogram that implements it.
	(Might_Need_BIP_Task_Actuals): New subprogram.
	(Create_Extra_Formals): Improve code adding inherited extra
	formals.

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions