diff options
author | Jie Zhang <jie@codesourcery.com> | 2010-10-26 16:13:04 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jie Zhang <jiez@gcc.gnu.org> | 2010-10-26 16:13:04 +0000 |
commit | 0d600fce5ba0aae8073f84b9c5f9296233f6f269 (patch) | |
tree | 1def84239e3f47c486cb01d95ea163c2e57e1573 /gcc/doc | |
parent | 75264e61bdb256689fb9fc1492bf6586ae2449fe (diff) | |
download | gcc-0d600fce5ba0aae8073f84b9c5f9296233f6f269.zip gcc-0d600fce5ba0aae8073f84b9c5f9296233f6f269.tar.gz gcc-0d600fce5ba0aae8073f84b9c5f9296233f6f269.tar.bz2 |
invoke.texi: Improve documentation of -fstrict-volatile-bitfields.
* doc/invoke.texi: Improve documentation of
-fstrict-volatile-bitfields.
From-SVN: r165971
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/doc')
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 14 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi index ee68454..7ea042f 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi @@ -18120,8 +18120,8 @@ is at @uref{http://gcc.gnu.org/@/wiki/@/Visibility}. @opindex fstrict-volatile-bitfields This option should be used if accesses to volatile bitfields (or other structure fields, although the compiler usually honors those types -anyway) should use a single access in a mode of the same size as the -container's type, aligned to a natural alignment if possible. For +anyway) should use a single access of the width of the +field's type, aligned to a natural alignment if possible. For example, targets with memory-mapped peripheral registers might require all such accesses to be 16 bits wide; with this flag the user could declare all peripheral bitfields as ``unsigned short'' (assuming short @@ -18134,11 +18134,13 @@ instruction, even though that will access bytes that do not contain any portion of the bitfield, or memory-mapped registers unrelated to the one being updated. -If the target requires strict alignment, and honoring the container +If the target requires strict alignment, and honoring the field type would require violating this alignment, a warning is issued. -However, the access happens as the user requested, under the -assumption that the user knows something about the target hardware -that GCC is unaware of. +If the field has @code{packed} attribute, the access is done without +honoring the field type. If the field doesn't have @code{packed} +attribute, the access is done honoring the field type. In both cases, +GCC assumes that the user knows something about the target hardware +that it is unaware of. The default value of this option is determined by the application binary interface for the target processor. |