diff options
| author | David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com> | 2024-06-12 09:15:09 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com> | 2024-06-12 09:15:09 -0400 |
| commit | fc47393acfae8188c131e46bc1c5379c722eab84 (patch) | |
| tree | 92de0c899f515dd0cde2cb3221a83fe1bcf2f162 /gcc/digraph.h | |
| parent | d0da347a1dd6e57cb0e0c55fd654d81dde545cf8 (diff) | |
| download | gcc-fc47393acfae8188c131e46bc1c5379c722eab84.zip gcc-fc47393acfae8188c131e46bc1c5379c722eab84.tar.gz gcc-fc47393acfae8188c131e46bc1c5379c722eab84.tar.bz2 | |
pretty_printer: rename instances named "buffer" to "pp"
Various pretty_printer instances are named "buffer", but a
pretty_printer *has* a buffer, rather than *is* a buffer.
For example,
pp_buffer (buffer)->digit_buffer
is referring to "buffer"'s buffer's digit_buffer.
This mechanical patch renames such variables to "pp", which I find much
clearer; the above becomes:
pp_buffer (pp)->digit_buffer
i.e. "pp's buffer's digit_buffer".
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
* c-ada-spec.cc: Rename pretty_printer "buffer" to "pp"
throughout.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* gimple-pretty-print.cc: Rename pretty_printer "buffer" to "pp"
throughout.
* print-tree.cc (print_node): Likewise.
* tree-loop-distribution.cc (dot_rdg_1): Likewise.
* tree-pretty-print.h (dump_location): Likewise.
* value-range.cc (vrange::dump): Likewise.
(irange_bitmask::dump): Likewise.
Signed-off-by: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/digraph.h')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions