diff options
author | Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck@naturalbridge.com> | 2009-01-03 00:31:39 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck@gcc.gnu.org> | 2009-01-03 00:31:39 +0000 |
commit | fafe34f91a12944c20cd13bd403ee2111ed19ff7 (patch) | |
tree | acfc015900a56222cebb9128e55478b27fa44d40 /gcc/df-problems.c | |
parent | 0ede37fed4a47c959ab369d5028609c0c1a16e00 (diff) | |
download | gcc-fafe34f91a12944c20cd13bd403ee2111ed19ff7.zip gcc-fafe34f91a12944c20cd13bd403ee2111ed19ff7.tar.gz gcc-fafe34f91a12944c20cd13bd403ee2111ed19ff7.tar.bz2 |
re PR tree-optimization/35805 ([ira] error in start_allocno_priorities, at ira-color.c:1806)
2009-01-02 Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck@naturalbridge.com>
PR rtl-optimization/35805
* df-problems.c (df_lr_finalize): Add recursive call to resolve lr
problem if fast dce is able to remove any instructions.
* dce.c (dce_process_block): Fix dump message.
From-SVN: r143027
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/df-problems.c')
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/df-problems.c | 33 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/df-problems.c b/gcc/df-problems.c index 9175f10..0bfef8a 100644 --- a/gcc/df-problems.c +++ b/gcc/df-problems.c @@ -1001,25 +1001,34 @@ df_lr_transfer_function (int bb_index) /* Run the fast dce as a side effect of building LR. */ static void -df_lr_finalize (bitmap all_blocks ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED) +df_lr_finalize (bitmap all_blocks) { + df_lr->solutions_dirty = false; if (df->changeable_flags & DF_LR_RUN_DCE) { run_fast_df_dce (); - if (df_lr->problem_data && df_lr->solutions_dirty) + + /* If dce deletes some instructions, we need to recompute the lr + solution before proceeding further. The problem is that fast + dce is a pessimestic dataflow algorithm. In the case where + it deletes a statement S inside of a loop, the uses inside of + S may not be deleted from the dataflow solution because they + were carried around the loop. While it is conservatively + correct to leave these extra bits, the standards of df + require that we maintain the best possible (least fixed + point) solution. The only way to do that is to redo the + iteration from the beginning. See PR35805 for an + example. */ + if (df_lr->solutions_dirty) { - /* If we are here, then it is because we are both verifying - the solution and the dce changed the function. In that case - the verification info built will be wrong. So we leave the - dirty flag true so that the verifier will skip the checking - part and just clean up.*/ - df_lr->solutions_dirty = true; + df_clear_flags (DF_LR_RUN_DCE); + df_lr_alloc (all_blocks); + df_lr_local_compute (all_blocks); + df_worklist_dataflow (df_lr, all_blocks, df->postorder, df->n_blocks); + df_lr_finalize (all_blocks); + df_set_flags (DF_LR_RUN_DCE); } - else - df_lr->solutions_dirty = false; } - else - df_lr->solutions_dirty = false; } |