diff options
| author | Ju-Zhe Zhong <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai> | 2022-10-25 21:53:23 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com> | 2022-10-26 17:05:24 +0800 |
| commit | 4329d111f48cba9ea560fc0a36f4cb5a290decb2 (patch) | |
| tree | dbcb0d705ce923e4281101cf682c213dd7bd8c10 /gcc/cppmain.c | |
| parent | 7e924ba3474b96a6c0b87c38cc4fca7af8d3910c (diff) | |
| download | gcc-4329d111f48cba9ea560fc0a36f4cb5a290decb2.zip gcc-4329d111f48cba9ea560fc0a36f4cb5a290decb2.tar.gz gcc-4329d111f48cba9ea560fc0a36f4cb5a290decb2.tar.bz2 | |
RISC-V: Fix epilogue generation for barrier.
I noticed that I have made a mistake in previous patch:
https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/patch/20220817071950.271762-1-juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai/
The previous statement before this patch:
bool need_barrier_p = (get_frame_size () + cfun->machine->frame.arg_pointer_offset) != 0;
However, I changed it in the previous patch:
bool need_barrier_p = known_ne (get_frame_size (), cfun->machine->frame.arg_pointer_offset);
This is incorrect.
Now, I correct this statement in this patch.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_expand_epilogue): Fix statement.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/cppmain.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions