diff options
author | Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> | 2019-11-07 12:06:09 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jason Merrill <jason@gcc.gnu.org> | 2019-11-07 12:06:09 -0500 |
commit | 4629ea55608ee2f1e04186dce2c7f55af0537ccb (patch) | |
tree | 346c49fc402d4acd850ead528e3511d706db7946 /gcc/cp | |
parent | c38ee9a2e87ea6d23580c364b3997acfce4a125c (diff) | |
download | gcc-4629ea55608ee2f1e04186dce2c7f55af0537ccb.zip gcc-4629ea55608ee2f1e04186dce2c7f55af0537ccb.tar.gz gcc-4629ea55608ee2f1e04186dce2c7f55af0537ccb.tar.bz2 |
Implement D1959R0, remove weak_equality and strong_equality.
Shortly after I finished implementing the previous semantics, the
committee decided to remove the *_equality comparison categories, because
they were largely obsoleted by the earlier change that separated operator==
from its original dependency on operator<=>.
gcc/cp/
* method.c (enum comp_cat_tag, comp_cat_info): Remove *_equality.
(genericize_spaceship, common_comparison_type): Likewise.
* typeck.c (cp_build_binary_op): Move SPACESHIP_EXPR to be with the
relational operators, exclude other types no longer supported.
libstdc++-v3/
* libsupc++/compare: Remove strong_equality and weak_equality.
From-SVN: r277925
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/cp')
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/cp/ChangeLog | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/cp/method.c | 47 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/cp/typeck.c | 13 |
3 files changed, 22 insertions, 46 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog index a0b93e7..2aa0afa 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +2019-11-07 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> + + Implement D1959R0, remove weak_equality and strong_equality. + * method.c (enum comp_cat_tag, comp_cat_info): Remove *_equality. + (genericize_spaceship, common_comparison_type): Likewise. + * typeck.c (cp_build_binary_op): Move SPACESHIP_EXPR to be with the + relational operators, exclude other types no longer supported. + 2019-11-06 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> Implement D1907R1 "structural type". diff --git a/gcc/cp/method.c b/gcc/cp/method.c index c9dd90f..47441c1 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/method.c +++ b/gcc/cp/method.c @@ -882,8 +882,6 @@ do_build_copy_assign (tree fndecl) enum comp_cat_tag { - cc_weak_equality, - cc_strong_equality, cc_partial_ordering, cc_weak_ordering, cc_strong_ordering, @@ -901,8 +899,6 @@ struct comp_cat_info_t }; static const comp_cat_info_t comp_cat_info[cc_last] = { - { "weak_equality", "equivalent", "nonequivalent" }, - { "strong_equality", "equal", "nonequal" }, { "partial_ordering", "equivalent", "greater", "less", "unordered" }, { "weak_ordering", "equivalent", "greater", "less" }, { "strong_ordering", "equal", "greater", "less" } @@ -1028,21 +1024,8 @@ spaceship_comp_cat (tree optype) return cc_strong_ordering; else if (TREE_CODE (optype) == REAL_TYPE) return cc_partial_ordering; - else if (TYPE_PTRFN_P (optype) || TYPE_PTRMEM_P (optype) - || NULLPTR_TYPE_P (optype)) - return cc_strong_equality; - else if (TREE_CODE (optype) == COMPLEX_TYPE) - { - tree intype = optype; - while (TREE_CODE (intype) == COMPLEX_TYPE) - intype = TREE_TYPE (intype); - if (TREE_CODE (intype) == REAL_TYPE) - return cc_weak_equality; - else - return cc_strong_equality; - } - /* FIXME should vector <=> produce a vector of one of the above? */ + /* ??? should vector <=> produce a vector of one of the above? */ gcc_unreachable (); } @@ -1065,35 +1048,29 @@ genericize_spaceship (tree type, tree op0, tree op1) comp_cat_tag tag = cat_tag_for (type); gcc_checking_assert (tag < cc_last); - tree eq = lookup_comparison_result (tag, type, 0); - tree negt = lookup_comparison_result (tag, type, 1); - - if (tag == cc_strong_equality || tag == cc_weak_equality) - { - tree comp = fold_build2 (EQ_EXPR, boolean_type_node, op0, op1); - return fold_build3 (COND_EXPR, type, comp, eq, negt); - } - tree r; op0 = save_expr (op0); op1 = save_expr (op1); + tree gt = lookup_comparison_result (tag, type, 1); + if (tag == cc_partial_ordering) { /* op0 == op1 ? equivalent : op0 < op1 ? less : op0 > op1 ? greater : unordered */ tree uo = lookup_comparison_result (tag, type, 3); tree comp = fold_build2 (GT_EXPR, boolean_type_node, op0, op1); - r = fold_build3 (COND_EXPR, type, comp, negt, uo); + r = fold_build3 (COND_EXPR, type, comp, gt, uo); } else /* op0 == op1 ? equal : op0 < op1 ? less : greater */ - r = negt; + r = gt; tree lt = lookup_comparison_result (tag, type, 2); tree comp = fold_build2 (LT_EXPR, boolean_type_node, op0, op1); r = fold_build3 (COND_EXPR, type, comp, lt, r); + tree eq = lookup_comparison_result (tag, type, 0); comp = fold_build2 (EQ_EXPR, boolean_type_node, op0, op1); r = fold_build3 (COND_EXPR, type, comp, eq, r); @@ -1178,18 +1155,6 @@ common_comparison_type (vec<tree> &comps) return void_type_node; } - /* Otherwise, if at least one T i is std::weak_equality, or at least one T i - is std::strong_equality and at least one T j is std::partial_ordering or - std::weak_ordering, U is std::weak_equality. */ - if (tree t = seen[cc_weak_equality]) return t; - if (seen[cc_strong_equality] - && (seen[cc_partial_ordering] || seen[cc_weak_ordering])) - return lookup_comparison_category (cc_weak_equality); - - /* Otherwise, if at least one T i is std::strong_equality, U is - std::strong_equality. */ - if (tree t = seen[cc_strong_equality]) return t; - /* Otherwise, if at least one T i is std::partial_ordering, U is std::partial_ordering. */ if (tree t = seen[cc_partial_ordering]) return t; diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck.c b/gcc/cp/typeck.c index 38a15d1..124d16a 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/typeck.c +++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.c @@ -4889,7 +4889,6 @@ cp_build_binary_op (const op_location_t &location, case EQ_EXPR: case NE_EXPR: - case SPACESHIP_EXPR: if (code0 == VECTOR_TYPE && code1 == VECTOR_TYPE) goto vector_compare; if ((complain & tf_warning) @@ -4966,9 +4965,7 @@ cp_build_binary_op (const op_location_t &location, warn_for_null_address (location, op1, complain); } else if ((code0 == POINTER_TYPE && code1 == POINTER_TYPE) - || (code == SPACESHIP_EXPR - ? TYPE_PTRMEM_P (type0) && TYPE_PTRMEM_P (type1) - : TYPE_PTRDATAMEM_P (type0) && TYPE_PTRDATAMEM_P (type1))) + || (TYPE_PTRDATAMEM_P (type0) && TYPE_PTRDATAMEM_P (type1))) result_type = composite_pointer_type (location, type0, type1, op0, op1, CPO_COMPARISON, complain); @@ -5172,6 +5169,7 @@ cp_build_binary_op (const op_location_t &location, case GE_EXPR: case LT_EXPR: case GT_EXPR: + case SPACESHIP_EXPR: if (TREE_CODE (orig_op0) == STRING_CST || TREE_CODE (orig_op1) == STRING_CST) { @@ -5369,7 +5367,9 @@ cp_build_binary_op (const op_location_t &location, tree_code orig_code0 = TREE_CODE (orig_type0); tree orig_type1 = TREE_TYPE (orig_op1); tree_code orig_code1 = TREE_CODE (orig_type1); - if ((orig_code0 == BOOLEAN_TYPE) != (orig_code1 == BOOLEAN_TYPE)) + if (!result_type) + /* Nope. */; + else if ((orig_code0 == BOOLEAN_TYPE) != (orig_code1 == BOOLEAN_TYPE)) /* "If one of the operands is of type bool and the other is not, the program is ill-formed." */ result_type = NULL_TREE; @@ -5378,6 +5378,9 @@ cp_build_binary_op (const op_location_t &location, /* We only do array/function-to-pointer conversion if "at least one of the operands is of pointer type". */ result_type = NULL_TREE; + else if (TYPE_PTRFN_P (result_type) || NULLPTR_TYPE_P (result_type)) + /* <=> no longer supports equality relations. */ + result_type = NULL_TREE; else if (orig_code0 == ENUMERAL_TYPE && orig_code1 == ENUMERAL_TYPE && !(same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (orig_type0, orig_type1))) |