diff options
author | Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com> | 2020-03-28 08:56:59 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com> | 2020-03-28 08:56:59 -0400 |
commit | a7ea3d2ced786c4544fa625f34f515d89ed074fe (patch) | |
tree | 5d72578ca8e5a5be0fbb57cbd820e4bb2f1a175b /gcc/cp/semantics.c | |
parent | cd68edf894d6b72e5bc37ac205deef9d237ab70b (diff) | |
download | gcc-a7ea3d2ced786c4544fa625f34f515d89ed074fe.zip gcc-a7ea3d2ced786c4544fa625f34f515d89ed074fe.tar.gz gcc-a7ea3d2ced786c4544fa625f34f515d89ed074fe.tar.bz2 |
c++: requires-expression outside of a template is misevaluated [PR94252]
This PR shows that a REQUIRES_EXPR outside of a template can sometimes be
misevaluated. This happens because the evaluation routine tsubst_requires_expr
(and diagnose_requires_expr) assumes the REQUIRES_EXPR's subtrees are templated
trees and that therefore it's safe to call tsubst_expr on them. But this
assumption isn't valid when we've parsed a REQUIRES_EXPR outside of a template
context. In order to make this assumption valid here, this patch sets
processing_template_decl to non-zero before parsing the body of a REQUIRES_EXPR
so that its subtrees are indeed always templated trees.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/94252
* constraint.cc (tsubst_compound_requirement): Always suppress errors
from type_deducible_p and expression_convertible_p, as they're not
substitution errors.
(diagnose_atomic_constraint) <case INTEGER_CST>: Remove this case so
that we diagnose INTEGER_CST expressions of non-bool type via the
default case.
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_genericize_r) <case REQUIRES_EXPR>: New case.
* parser.c (cp_parser_requires_expression): Always parse the requirement
body as if we're processing a template, by temporarily incrementing
processing_template_decl. Afterwards, if we're not actually in a
template context, perform semantic processing to diagnose any invalid
types and expressions.
* pt.c (tsubst_copy_and_build) <case REQUIRES_EXPR>: Remove dead code.
* semantics.c (finish_static_assert): Explain an assertion failure
when the condition is a REQUIRES_EXPR like we do when it is a concept
check.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/94252
* g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic7.C: New test.
* g++.dg/concepts/pr94252.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-requires18.C: Adjust to expect an additional
diagnostic.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/cp/semantics.c')
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/cp/semantics.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.c b/gcc/cp/semantics.c index 2721a55..38637bd 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/semantics.c +++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.c @@ -9687,8 +9687,10 @@ finish_static_assert (tree condition, tree message, location_t location, error ("static assertion failed: %s", TREE_STRING_POINTER (message)); - /* Actually explain the failure if this is a concept check. */ - if (concept_check_p (orig_condition)) + /* Actually explain the failure if this is a concept check or a + requires-expression. */ + if (concept_check_p (orig_condition) + || TREE_CODE (orig_condition) == REQUIRES_EXPR) diagnose_constraints (location, orig_condition, NULL_TREE); } else if (condition && condition != error_mark_node) |