aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/cp/parser.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>2021-08-27 17:28:28 -0400
committerJason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>2021-08-30 16:48:28 -0400
commite18e56c76be35e6a799e07a01c24e0fff3eb1978 (patch)
tree766fbe1a70cbdf41dd9b401101eda0e8451d02c6 /gcc/cp/parser.c
parent9213ff13247739d6d335064a6b568278a872a991 (diff)
downloadgcc-e18e56c76be35e6a799e07a01c24e0fff3eb1978.zip
gcc-e18e56c76be35e6a799e07a01c24e0fff3eb1978.tar.gz
gcc-e18e56c76be35e6a799e07a01c24e0fff3eb1978.tar.bz2
c++: Add warning about missing 'requires'
I noticed that concepts-lambda14.C had two useless requires-expressions: static_assert(requires { C<T>; }); always succeeds, because C<T> is always a valid expression for any type, regardless of whether C is satisfied for a particular type. Presumably the user means static_assert(requires { requires C<T>; }); to make the C<T> a nested-requirement. Of course, static_assert(C<T>); is much simpler and means the same thing; this is more relevant in the middle of a longer requires-expression, such as the bug this warning found in cmcstl2: template<class I> META_CONCEPT input_iterator = input_or_output_iterator<I> && readable<I> && requires(I& i, const I& ci) { typename iterator_category_t<I>; derived_from<iterator_category_t<I>, input_iterator_tag>; i++; }; where 'requires' is missing before 'derived_from'. gcc/ChangeLog: * doc/invoke.texi: Document -Wmissing-requires. gcc/c-family/ChangeLog: * c.opt: Add -Wmissing-requires. gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * parser.c (cp_parser_simple_requirement): Warn about missing requires. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-lambda14.C: Add expected warnings.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/cp/parser.c')
-rw-r--r--gcc/cp/parser.c19
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c
index a959c71..797e70b 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c
@@ -29911,6 +29911,25 @@ cp_parser_simple_requirement (cp_parser *parser)
if (expr.get_location() == UNKNOWN_LOCATION)
expr.set_location (start);
+ for (tree t = expr; ; )
+ {
+ if (TREE_CODE (t) == TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR
+ || TREE_CODE (t) == TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR)
+ {
+ t = TREE_OPERAND (t, 0);
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (concept_check_p (t))
+ {
+ gcc_rich_location richloc (get_start (start));
+ richloc.add_fixit_insert_before (start, "requires ");
+ warning_at (&richloc, OPT_Wmissing_requires, "testing "
+ "if a concept-id is a valid expression; add "
+ "%<requires%> to check satisfaction");
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+
return finish_simple_requirement (expr.get_location (), expr);
}