re PR middle-end/15885 (wrong va_start warning (and code))

        * cp-lang.c (cxx_types_compatible_p): To the middle-end,
        references and pointers are compatible.

        PR middle-end/15885
        * gimplify.c (gimplify_arg): New fn, split out from...
        (gimplify_call_expr): Here.  Special-case BUILT_IN_VA_START.

From-SVN: r84782

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-lang.c b/gcc/cp/cp-lang.c
index 5f38fbb..b6e933f 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cp-lang.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/cp-lang.c
@@ -317,9 +317,23 @@ cp_var_mod_type_p (tree type, tree fn)
   return false;
 }
 
+/* This compares two types for equivalence ("compatible" in C-based languages).
+   This routine should only return 1 if it is sure.  It should not be used
+   in contexts where erroneously returning 0 causes problems.  */
+
 static int cxx_types_compatible_p (tree x, tree y)
 {
-  return same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (x, y);
+  if (same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (x, y))
+    return 1;
+
+  /* Once we get to the middle-end, references and pointers are
+     interchangeable.  FIXME should we try to replace all references with
+     pointers?  */
+  if (POINTER_TYPE_P (x) && POINTER_TYPE_P (y)
+      && same_type_p (TREE_TYPE (x), TREE_TYPE (y)))
+    return 1;
+
+  return 0;
 }
 
 /* Construct a C++-aware pretty-printer for CONTEXT.  It is assumed