diff options
| author | Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com> | 2023-03-03 21:23:06 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> | 2023-03-07 02:23:57 +0100 |
| commit | e43f970c7ff6aa7e410a59b275542db678c7f2d7 (patch) | |
| tree | 1f0cd97ca4e3071f6bff54b6ec02a397169f2ec1 /gcc/cp/constexpr.cc | |
| parent | 318c9101a3bc24e4cd1a89eeb52531988a11c89f (diff) | |
| download | gcc-e43f970c7ff6aa7e410a59b275542db678c7f2d7.zip gcc-e43f970c7ff6aa7e410a59b275542db678c7f2d7.tar.gz gcc-e43f970c7ff6aa7e410a59b275542db678c7f2d7.tar.bz2 | |
testsuite: Gate gcc.dg/plugin/must-tail-call-1.c and -2.c on tail_call
While gcc.dg/plugin/must-tail-call-2.c passes for all targets even
without this, the error message is, for a target like cris-elf that
doesn't implement sibling calls: "error: cannot tail-call: machine
description does not have a sibcall_epilogue instruction pattern"
rather than "error: cannot tail-call: callee returns a structure".
Also, it'd be confusing to exclude must-tail-call-1.c but not
must-tail-call-2.c
* gcc.dg/plugin/must-tail-call-1.c, gcc.dg/plugin/must-tail-call-2.c:
Gate on effective target tail_call.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/cp/constexpr.cc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions