diff options
author | Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com> | 2021-04-20 20:24:09 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com> | 2021-04-22 17:35:38 -0400 |
commit | 244dfb95119106e9267f37583caac565c39eb0ec (patch) | |
tree | 157a684ffc69a6222e8e7d96917b11dc3942aa37 /gcc/config.gcc | |
parent | 3275f2e2af24541f55462c23af4c6530ac12c5e2 (diff) | |
download | gcc-244dfb95119106e9267f37583caac565c39eb0ec.zip gcc-244dfb95119106e9267f37583caac565c39eb0ec.tar.gz gcc-244dfb95119106e9267f37583caac565c39eb0ec.tar.bz2 |
c++: Prevent bogus -Wtype-limits warning with NTTP [PR100161]
Recently, we made sure that we never call value_dependent_expression_p
on an expression that isn't potential_constant_expression. That caused
this bogus warning with a non-type template parameter, something that
users don't want to see.
The problem is that in tsubst_copy_and_build/LE_EXPR 't' is "i < n",
which, due to 'i', is not p_c_e, therefore we call t_d_e_p. But the
type of 'n' isn't dependent, so we think the whole 't' expression is
not dependent. It seems we need to test both op0 and op1 separately
to suppress this warning.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/100161
* pt.c (tsubst_copy_and_build) <case PLUS_EXPR>: Test op0 and
op1 separately for value- or type-dependence.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/100161
* g++.dg/warn/Wtype-limits6.C: New test.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/config.gcc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions