i386: Fix up *_doubleword_mask [PR105825]

My PR105778 patch apparently broke the following testcase.
If the mask has the top relevant bit clear (i.e. we know we are shifting
by 0 to wordsize bits - 1) but doesn't have all the bits below it set,
we emit andsi3 before the shift sequence.  When the pattern had :SI
for that operand, that was just fine, but now that it can be also HImode
or for -m64 DImode, we either can use a lowpart or paradoxical subreg to
SImode as the following patch, or we use a HImode or DImode AND.
This patch does the latter.

2022-06-04  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR target/105825
	* config/i386/i386.md (*ashl<dwi>3_doubleword_mask,
	*<insn><dwi>3_doubleword_mask): If top bit of mask is clear, but lower
	bits of mask aren't all set, use operands[2] mode for the AND
	operation instead of always SImode.

	* gcc.dg/pr105825.c: New test.

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions