aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/builtins.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDodji Seketeli <dodji@redhat.com>2012-04-30 11:43:14 +0000
committerDodji Seketeli <dodji@gcc.gnu.org>2012-04-30 13:43:14 +0200
commit34c8879087689377b44c833c752948fc496f4f50 (patch)
treecab53a5bbcf101f0462b2c5d3119d48bcfc3bf6c /gcc/builtins.c
parentbfd93a72d259d4f372846f6f9ad6adbf4bb7f367 (diff)
downloadgcc-34c8879087689377b44c833c752948fc496f4f50.zip
gcc-34c8879087689377b44c833c752948fc496f4f50.tar.gz
gcc-34c8879087689377b44c833c752948fc496f4f50.tar.bz2
Fix va_start related location
In gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr30457.c, the first warning was not being emitted because the relevant location was inside the var_start macro defined in a system header. It can even point to a token for a builtin macro there. This patch unwinds to the first token in real source code in that case. Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu against trunk. * builtins.c (fold_builtin_next_arg): Unwinds to the first location in real source code. From-SVN: r186975
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/builtins.c')
-rw-r--r--gcc/builtins.c23
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/builtins.c b/gcc/builtins.c
index b47f218..5ddc47b 100644
--- a/gcc/builtins.c
+++ b/gcc/builtins.c
@@ -12095,6 +12095,13 @@ fold_builtin_next_arg (tree exp, bool va_start_p)
tree fntype = TREE_TYPE (current_function_decl);
int nargs = call_expr_nargs (exp);
tree arg;
+ /* There is good chance the current input_location points inside the
+ definition of the va_start macro (perhaps on the token for
+ builtin) in a system header, so warnings will not be emitted.
+ Use the location in real source code. */
+ source_location current_location =
+ linemap_unwind_to_first_non_reserved_loc (line_table, input_location,
+ NULL);
if (!stdarg_p (fntype))
{
@@ -12119,7 +12126,9 @@ fold_builtin_next_arg (tree exp, bool va_start_p)
{
/* Evidently an out of date version of <stdarg.h>; can't validate
va_start's second argument, but can still work as intended. */
- warning (0, "%<__builtin_next_arg%> called without an argument");
+ warning_at (current_location,
+ 0,
+ "%<__builtin_next_arg%> called without an argument");
return true;
}
else if (nargs > 1)
@@ -12154,7 +12163,9 @@ fold_builtin_next_arg (tree exp, bool va_start_p)
argument. We just warn and set the arg to be the last
argument so that we will get wrong-code because of
it. */
- warning (0, "second parameter of %<va_start%> not last named argument");
+ warning_at (current_location,
+ 0,
+ "second parameter of %<va_start%> not last named argument");
}
/* Undefined by C99 7.15.1.4p4 (va_start):
@@ -12164,8 +12175,12 @@ fold_builtin_next_arg (tree exp, bool va_start_p)
the default argument promotions, the behavior is undefined."
*/
else if (DECL_REGISTER (arg))
- warning (0, "undefined behaviour when second parameter of "
- "%<va_start%> is declared with %<register%> storage");
+ {
+ warning_at (current_location,
+ 0,
+ "undefined behaviour when second parameter of "
+ "%<va_start%> is declared with %<register%> storage");
+ }
/* We want to verify the second parameter just once before the tree
optimizers are run and then avoid keeping it in the tree,