aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/ada/sem_res.adb
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>2023-04-12 01:16:20 +0200
committerMarc Poulhiès <poulhies@adacore.com>2023-05-30 09:12:16 +0200
commit53b05858fb070f3a21818d1649c73c9f90c6745a (patch)
tree62dc3f744e6d4c5f87c20546c58653268b2bcaa6 /gcc/ada/sem_res.adb
parent32e6ea21745153b440cb56b96d35a4b06bb473d6 (diff)
downloadgcc-53b05858fb070f3a21818d1649c73c9f90c6745a.zip
gcc-53b05858fb070f3a21818d1649c73c9f90c6745a.tar.gz
gcc-53b05858fb070f3a21818d1649c73c9f90c6745a.tar.bz2
ada: Fix regression of secondary stack management in return statements
This happens when the expression of the return statement is a call that does not return on the same stack as the enclosing function. gcc/ada/ * sem_res.adb (Resolve_Call): Restrict previous change to calls that return on the same stack as the enclosing function. Tidy up.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/ada/sem_res.adb')
-rw-r--r--gcc/ada/sem_res.adb69
1 files changed, 31 insertions, 38 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_res.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_res.adb
index b16e489..c2a4bcb 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/sem_res.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/sem_res.adb
@@ -6923,69 +6923,62 @@ package body Sem_Res is
return;
end if;
- -- Create a transient scope if the resulting type requires it
+ -- Create a transient scope if the expander is active and the resulting
+ -- type requires it.
-- There are several notable exceptions:
- -- a) In init procs, the transient scope overhead is not needed, and is
- -- even incorrect when the call is a nested initialization call for a
- -- component whose expansion may generate adjust calls. However, if the
- -- call is some other procedure call within an initialization procedure
- -- (for example a call to Create_Task in the init_proc of the task
- -- run-time record) a transient scope must be created around this call.
-
- -- b) Enumeration literal pseudo-calls need no transient scope
-
- -- c) Intrinsic subprograms (Unchecked_Conversion and source info
+ -- a) Intrinsic subprograms (Unchecked_Conversion and source info
-- functions) do not use the secondary stack even though the return
-- type may be unconstrained.
- -- d) Calls to a build-in-place function, since such functions may
+ -- b) Subprograms that are ignored ghost entities do not return anything
+
+ -- c) Calls to a build-in-place function, since such functions may
-- allocate their result directly in a target object, and cases where
-- the result does get allocated in the secondary stack are checked for
-- within the specialized Exp_Ch6 procedures for expanding those
-- build-in-place calls.
- -- e) Calls to inlinable expression functions do not use the secondary
+ -- d) Calls to inlinable expression functions do not use the secondary
-- stack (since the call will be replaced by its returned object).
- -- f) If the subprogram is marked Inline_Always, then even if it returns
+ -- e) If the subprogram is marked Inline, then even if it returns
-- an unconstrained type the call does not require use of the secondary
-- stack. However, inlining will only take place if the body to inline
-- is already present. It may not be available if e.g. the subprogram is
-- declared in a child instance.
- -- g) If the subprogram is a static expression function and the call is
+ -- f) If the subprogram is a static expression function and the call is
-- a static call (the actuals are all static expressions), then we never
-- want to create a transient scope (this could occur in the case of a
-- static string-returning call).
- -- h) If the subprogram is an ignored ghost entity, because it does not
- -- return anything.
-
- -- i) If the call is the expression of a simple return statement, since
- -- it will be handled as a tail call by Expand_Simple_Function_Return.
-
- if Is_Inlined (Nam)
- and then Has_Pragma_Inline (Nam)
- and then Nkind (Unit_Declaration_Node (Nam)) = N_Subprogram_Declaration
- and then Present (Body_To_Inline (Unit_Declaration_Node (Nam)))
- then
- null;
+ -- g) If the call is the expression of a simple return statement that
+ -- returns on the same stack, since it will be handled as a tail call
+ -- by Expand_Simple_Function_Return.
- elsif Ekind (Nam) = E_Enumeration_Literal
- or else Is_Build_In_Place_Function (Nam)
- or else Is_Intrinsic_Subprogram (Nam)
- or else Is_Inlinable_Expression_Function (Nam)
- or else Is_Static_Function_Call (N)
- or else Is_Ignored_Ghost_Entity (Nam)
- or else Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Simple_Return_Statement
- then
- null;
-
- elsif Expander_Active
+ if Expander_Active
and then Ekind (Nam) in E_Function | E_Subprogram_Type
and then Requires_Transient_Scope (Etype (Nam))
+ and then not Is_Intrinsic_Subprogram (Nam)
+ and then not Is_Ignored_Ghost_Entity (Nam)
+ and then not Is_Build_In_Place_Function (Nam)
+ and then not Is_Inlinable_Expression_Function (Nam)
+ and then not (Is_Inlined (Nam)
+ and then Has_Pragma_Inline (Nam)
+ and then Nkind (Unit_Declaration_Node (Nam)) =
+ N_Subprogram_Declaration
+ and then
+ Present (Body_To_Inline (Unit_Declaration_Node (Nam))))
+ and then not Is_Static_Function_Call (N)
+ and then not (Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Simple_Return_Statement
+ and then
+ Needs_Secondary_Stack
+ (Etype
+ (Return_Applies_To
+ (Return_Statement_Entity (Parent (N))))) =
+ Needs_Secondary_Stack (Etype (Nam)))
then
Establish_Transient_Scope (N, Needs_Secondary_Stack (Etype (Nam)));