aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/ada/gcc-interface
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSteve Baird <baird@adacore.com>2022-08-12 17:04:38 -0700
committerMarc Poulhiès <poulhies@adacore.com>2022-09-06 09:14:23 +0200
commit71747dda9d491b8b28df20eaed84c71ca75f51d0 (patch)
tree1312ebe331a83136add4714f4cd2f6c4a2a3c1ec /gcc/ada/gcc-interface
parentfc737a6c2001e303a3509df7b1125b8e3d7ea651 (diff)
downloadgcc-71747dda9d491b8b28df20eaed84c71ca75f51d0.zip
gcc-71747dda9d491b8b28df20eaed84c71ca75f51d0.tar.gz
gcc-71747dda9d491b8b28df20eaed84c71ca75f51d0.tar.bz2
[Ada] Enable lock free protected implementation by default
In the past, the Lock_Free aspect of a protected type (including an anonymous type) defaulted to False. In the case where an explicit "Lock_Free => True" aspect specification would be legal, the aspect now defaults to True (which means that a lock-free implementation is used to implement the type's protected operations); this is like the previous behavior of the compiler with the -gnatd9 switch specified. Support for the Lock_Free attribute (which should not be confused with the Lock_Free aspect) is removed. gcc/ada/ * debug.adb: Remove comment regarding the -gnatd9 switch. * doc/gnat_rm/implementation_defined_attributes.rst: Remove all mention of the Lock_Free attribute. * gnat_rm.texi, gnat_ugn.texi: Regenerate. * exp_attr.adb, sem_attr.adb: Remove all mention of the former Attribute_Lock_Free enumeration element of the Attribute_Id type. * sem_ch9.adb (Allows_Lock_Free_Implementation): Remove the Debug_Flag_9 test. Return False in the case of a protected function whose result type requires use of the secondary stack. (Satisfies_Lock_Free_Requirements): This functions checks for certain constructs and returns False if one is found. In the case of a protected function, there is no need to check to see if the protected object is being modified. So it is ok to omit *some* checks in the case of a protected function. But other checks which are required (e.g., the test for a reference to a variable that is not part of the protected object) were being incorrectly omitted. This could result in accepting "Lock_Free => True" aspect specifications that should be rejected. * snames.adb-tmpl: Name_Lock_Free no longer requires special treatment in Get_Pragma_Id or Is_Pragma_Name (because it is no longer an attribute name). * snames.ads-tmpl: Move the declaration of Name_Lock_Free to reflect the fact that it is no longer the name of an attribute. Delete Attribute_Lock_Free from the Attribute_Id enumeration type.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/ada/gcc-interface')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions