diff options
author | Jiufu Guo <guojiufu@linux.ibm.com> | 2024-07-23 13:34:20 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | guojiufu <guojiufu@linux.ibm.com> | 2024-07-23 18:21:25 +0800 |
commit | 472eab9ab1fdfd0ba3a555ea9eb50e20307c7052 (patch) | |
tree | aaef8ca99e642abff50cfbb5db496e874d25d440 | |
parent | 7793f5b4194253acaac0b53d8a1c95d9b5c8f4bb (diff) | |
download | gcc-472eab9ab1fdfd0ba3a555ea9eb50e20307c7052.zip gcc-472eab9ab1fdfd0ba3a555ea9eb50e20307c7052.tar.gz gcc-472eab9ab1fdfd0ba3a555ea9eb50e20307c7052.tar.bz2 |
report message for operator %a on unaddressible operand
Hi,
For PR96866, when printing asm code for modifier "%a", an addressable
operand is required. While the constraint "X" allow any kind of
operand even which is hard to get the address directly. e.g. extern
symbol whose address is in TOC.
An error message would be reported to indicate the invalid asm operand.
Compare with previous version, test case is updated with -mno-pcrel.
Bootstrap®test pass on ppc64{,le}.
Is this ok for trunk?
BR,
Jeff(Jiufu Guo)
PR target/96866
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (print_operand_address): Emit message for
unsupported operand.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr96866-1.c: New test.
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr96866-2.c: New test.
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc | 7 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr96866-1.c | 18 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr96866-2.c | 13 |
3 files changed, 37 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc index 8521156..0bcc6a2 100644 --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc @@ -14706,7 +14706,12 @@ print_operand_address (FILE *file, rtx x) fprintf (file, "@%s(%s)", SMALL_DATA_RELOC, reg_names[SMALL_DATA_REG]); else - gcc_assert (!TARGET_TOC); + { + /* Do not support getting address directly from TOC, emit error. + No more work is needed for !TARGET_TOC. */ + if (TARGET_TOC) + output_operand_lossage ("%%a requires an address of memory"); + } } else if (GET_CODE (x) == PLUS && REG_P (XEXP (x, 0)) && REG_P (XEXP (x, 1))) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr96866-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr96866-1.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..72e59a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr96866-1.c @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +/* The "%a" modifier can't get the address of extern symbol directly from TOC + with -fPIC, even the symbol is propagated for "X" constraint under -O2. */ +/* { dg-options "-fPIC -O2 -mno-pcrel" } */ + +/* It's to verify no ICE here, ignore error messages about invalid 'asm'. */ +/* { dg-excess-errors "pr96866-1.c" } */ + +int x[2]; + +int __attribute__ ((noipa)) +f1 (void) +{ + int n; + int *p = x; + *p++; + __asm__ volatile("ld %0, %a1" : "=r"(n) : "X"(p)); + return n; +} diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr96866-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr96866-2.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..72bb15f --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr96866-2.c @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +/* The "%a" modifier can't get the address of extern symbol directly from TOC + with -fPIC. */ +/* { dg-options "-fPIC -O2 -mno-pcrel" } */ + +/* It's to verify no ICE here, ignore error messages about invalid 'asm'. */ +/* { dg-excess-errors "pr96866-2.c" } */ + +void +f (void) +{ + extern int x; + __asm__ volatile("#%a0" ::"X"(&x)); +} |