[Ada] Missing error on operator call

gcc/ada/

	* sem_ch6.adb (Analyze_Procedure_Call): Detect use of operators
	in a procedure call.
	* sem_util.adb: Minor edit.

2 files changed, 9 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_ch6.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_ch6.adb
index 6651671..11e496a 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/sem_ch6.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/sem_ch6.adb
@@ -2014,6 +2014,10 @@ package body Sem_Ch6 is
            and then Comes_From_Source (N)
          then
             Error_Msg_N ("missing explicit dereference in call", N);
+
+         elsif Ekind (Entity (P)) = E_Operator then
+            Error_Msg_Name_1 := Chars (P);
+            Error_Msg_N ("operator % cannot be used as a procedure", N);
          end if;
 
          Analyze_Call_And_Resolve;
diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_util.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_util.adb
index 93447cc..480e6f1 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/sem_util.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/sem_util.adb
@@ -28605,12 +28605,12 @@ package body Sem_Util is
       then
          return;
 
-      --  In  an instance, there is an ongoing problem with completion of
+      --  In an instance, there is an ongoing problem with completion of
       --  types derived from private types. Their structure is what Gigi
-      --  expects, but the  Etype is the parent type rather than the
-      --  derived private type itself. Do not flag error in this case. The
-      --  private completion is an entity without a parent, like an Itype.
-      --  Similarly, full and partial views may be incorrect in the instance.
+      --  expects, but the Etype is the parent type rather than the derived
+      --  private type itself. Do not flag error in this case. The private
+      --  completion is an entity without a parent, like an Itype. Similarly,
+      --  full and partial views may be incorrect in the instance.
       --  There is no simple way to insure that it is consistent ???
 
       --  A similar view discrepancy can happen in an inlined body, for the