diff options
| author | Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org> | 2006-09-10 04:58:29 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org> | 2006-09-10 04:58:29 +0000 |
| commit | fb366039a906e72f7724622f5befae03efb89aff (patch) | |
| tree | 744c6bba93c194064f3685f078de044c13e802b9 | |
| parent | bfa7a1e994988ef5827505e0e7540b810150f984 (diff) | |
| download | gcc-fb366039a906e72f7724622f5befae03efb89aff.zip gcc-fb366039a906e72f7724622f5befae03efb89aff.tar.gz gcc-fb366039a906e72f7724622f5befae03efb89aff.tar.bz2 | |
re PR fortran/28914 (Code inside loop hangs; outside loop runs normally; runs OK on other compilers)
2006-09-09 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/28914
* gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90: New test.
From-SVN: r116809
| -rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog | 5 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 | 25 |
2 files changed, 30 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index cd0f6f7..3d877ed 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2006-09-09 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org> + + PR fortran/28914 + * gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90: New test. + 2006-09-09 Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org> PR testsuite/26778 diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5b0d28a --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +! { dg-do run } +! Tests the fix for pr28914, in which array constructors using the loop +! variable within a do loop for the implied do loop of the constructor +! would result in a corrupted do loop counter. +! +! Based on the testscase by Ed Korkven <kornkven@arsc.edu> +! +program pr28914 + implicit none + integer n, i + parameter (n = 66000) ! Problem manifests for n > 65535 + double precision a(n), summation + + summation = 0.0 + do i = 1, 1 + a = (/ (i, i = 1, n) /) ! This is legal and was broken + a = sqrt(a) + summation = SUM(a) + enddo + summation = abs(summation - 11303932.9138271_8) + + if (summation.gt.0.00001) call abort() +end program pr28914 + + |