diff options
author | Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> | 2018-03-06 06:25:12 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@gcc.gnu.org> | 2018-03-06 06:25:12 +0000 |
commit | 23d63b459c032c41f99a7c735a33558e77d6baf7 (patch) | |
tree | 13f3e408fba20d613f4296a5ea55fd51999a632e | |
parent | 2e1a7ecb2d8f1ee3f88fd2906ab16eb30ab525f7 (diff) | |
download | gcc-23d63b459c032c41f99a7c735a33558e77d6baf7.zip gcc-23d63b459c032c41f99a7c735a33558e77d6baf7.tar.gz gcc-23d63b459c032c41f99a7c735a33558e77d6baf7.tar.bz2 |
[C++] [PR84231] overload on cond_expr in template
A non-type-dependent COND_EXPR within a template is reconstructed with
the original operands, after one with non-dependent proxies is built to
determine its result type. This is problematic because the operands of
a COND_EXPR determined to be an rvalue may have been converted to denote
their rvalue nature. The reconstructed one, however, won't have such
conversions, so lvalue_kind may not recognize it as an rvalue, which may
lead to e.g. incorrect overload resolution decisions.
If we mistake such a COND_EXPR for an lvalue, overload resolution might
regard a conversion sequence that binds it to a non-const reference as
viable, and then select that over one that binds it to a const
reference. Only after template substitution would we rebuild the
COND_EXPR, realize it is an rvalue, and conclude the reference binding
is ill-formed, but at that point we'd have long discarded any alternate
candidates we could have used.
This patch modifies the logic that determines whether a
(non-type-dependent) COND_EXPR in a template is an lvalue, to rely on
its type, more specifically, on the presence of a REFERENCE_TYPE
wrapper. In order to avoid a type bootstrapping problem, the
REFERENCE_TYPE that wraps the type of some such COND_EXPRs is
introduced earlier, so that we don't have to test for lvalueness of
the expression using the very code that we wish to change.
for gcc/cp/ChangeLog
PR c++/84231
* tree.c (lvalue_kind): Use presence/absence of REFERENCE_TYPE
only while processing template decls.
* typeck.c (build_x_conditional_expr): Move wrapping of
reference type around type...
* call.c (build_conditional_expr_1): ... here. Rename
is_lvalue to is_glvalue.
* parser.c (cp_parser_fold_expression): Catch REFERENCE_REF_P
INDIRECT_REF of COND_EXPR too.
for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
PR c++/84231
* g++.dg/pr84231.C: New.
From-SVN: r258271
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/cp/ChangeLog | 10 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/cp/call.c | 12 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/cp/parser.c | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/cp/tree.c | 15 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/cp/typeck.c | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog | 3 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr84231.C | 29 |
7 files changed, 68 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog index 3623405..bd2e104 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,15 @@ 2018-03-06 Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> + PR c++/84231 + * tree.c (lvalue_kind): Use presence/absence of REFERENCE_TYPE + only while processing template decls. + * typeck.c (build_x_conditional_expr): Move wrapping of + reference type around type... + * call.c (build_conditional_expr_1): ... here. Rename + is_lvalue to is_glvalue. + * parser.c (cp_parser_fold_expression): Catch REFERENCE_REF_P + INDIRECT_REF of COND_EXPR too. + PR c++/84593 * init.c (build_zero_init_1): Zero-initialize references. diff --git a/gcc/cp/call.c b/gcc/cp/call.c index 11fe282..f83d51f 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/call.c +++ b/gcc/cp/call.c @@ -4782,7 +4782,7 @@ build_conditional_expr_1 (location_t loc, tree arg1, tree arg2, tree arg3, tree arg3_type; tree result = NULL_TREE; tree result_type = NULL_TREE; - bool is_lvalue = true; + bool is_glvalue = true; struct z_candidate *candidates = 0; struct z_candidate *cand; void *p; @@ -5037,7 +5037,7 @@ build_conditional_expr_1 (location_t loc, tree arg1, tree arg2, tree arg3, return error_mark_node; } - is_lvalue = false; + is_glvalue = false; goto valid_operands; } /* [expr.cond] @@ -5155,6 +5155,10 @@ build_conditional_expr_1 (location_t loc, tree arg1, tree arg2, tree arg3, && same_type_p (arg2_type, arg3_type)) { result_type = arg2_type; + if (processing_template_decl) + /* Let lvalue_kind know this was a glvalue. */ + result_type = cp_build_reference_type (result_type, xvalue_p (arg2)); + arg2 = mark_lvalue_use (arg2); arg3 = mark_lvalue_use (arg3); goto valid_operands; @@ -5167,7 +5171,7 @@ build_conditional_expr_1 (location_t loc, tree arg1, tree arg2, tree arg3, cv-qualified) class type, overload resolution is used to determine the conversions (if any) to be applied to the operands (_over.match.oper_, _over.built_). */ - is_lvalue = false; + is_glvalue = false; if (!same_type_p (arg2_type, arg3_type) && (CLASS_TYPE_P (arg2_type) || CLASS_TYPE_P (arg3_type))) { @@ -5361,7 +5365,7 @@ build_conditional_expr_1 (location_t loc, tree arg1, tree arg2, tree arg3, /* We can't use result_type below, as fold might have returned a throw_expr. */ - if (!is_lvalue) + if (!is_glvalue) { /* Expand both sides into the same slot, hopefully the target of the ?: expression. We used to check for TARGET_EXPRs here, diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c index 460b5ea..a19bbe1 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/parser.c +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c @@ -4963,7 +4963,9 @@ cp_parser_fold_expression (cp_parser *parser, tree expr1) else if (is_binary_op (TREE_CODE (expr1))) error_at (location_of (expr1), "binary expression in operand of fold-expression"); - else if (TREE_CODE (expr1) == COND_EXPR) + else if (TREE_CODE (expr1) == COND_EXPR + || (REFERENCE_REF_P (expr1) + && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (expr1, 0)) == COND_EXPR)) error_at (location_of (expr1), "conditional expression in operand of fold-expression"); diff --git a/gcc/cp/tree.c b/gcc/cp/tree.c index 19f1c06..4cf2126 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/tree.c +++ b/gcc/cp/tree.c @@ -194,6 +194,21 @@ lvalue_kind (const_tree ref) break; case COND_EXPR: + if (processing_template_decl) + { + /* Within templates, a REFERENCE_TYPE will indicate whether + the COND_EXPR result is an ordinary lvalue or rvalueref. + Since REFERENCE_TYPEs are handled above, if we reach this + point, we know we got a plain rvalue. Unless we have a + type-dependent expr, that is, but we shouldn't be testing + lvalueness if we can't even tell the types yet! */ + gcc_assert (!type_dependent_expression_p (CONST_CAST_TREE (ref))); + if (CLASS_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (ref)) + || TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (ref)) == ARRAY_TYPE) + return clk_class; + else + return clk_none; + } op1_lvalue_kind = lvalue_kind (TREE_OPERAND (ref, 1) ? TREE_OPERAND (ref, 1) : TREE_OPERAND (ref, 0)); diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck.c b/gcc/cp/typeck.c index f535902..0c2ebd1 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/typeck.c +++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.c @@ -6567,10 +6567,6 @@ build_x_conditional_expr (location_t loc, tree ifexp, tree op1, tree op2, { tree min = build_min_non_dep (COND_EXPR, expr, orig_ifexp, orig_op1, orig_op2); - /* Remember that the result is an lvalue or xvalue. */ - if (glvalue_p (expr) && !glvalue_p (min)) - TREE_TYPE (min) = cp_build_reference_type (TREE_TYPE (min), - !lvalue_p (expr)); expr = convert_from_reference (min); } return expr; diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index 9c94d36..3de87e9 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@ 2018-03-06 Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> + PR c++/84231 + * g++.dg/pr84231.C: New. + PR c++/84593 * g++.dg/cpp1y/pr84593.C: New. diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr84231.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr84231.C new file mode 100644 index 0000000..de7c89a --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr84231.C @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +// PR c++/84231 - overload resolution with cond_expr in a template + +// { dg-do compile } + +struct format { + template<typename T> format& operator%(const T&) { return *this; } + template<typename T> format& operator%(T&) { return *this; } +}; + +format f; + +template <typename> +void function_template(bool b) +{ + // Compiles OK with array lvalue: + f % (b ? "x" : "x"); + + // Used to fails with pointer rvalue: + f % (b ? "" : "x"); +} + +void normal_function(bool b) +{ + // Both cases compile OK in non-template function: + f % (b ? "x" : "x"); + f % (b ? "" : "x"); + + function_template<void>(b); +} |