aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPatrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>2020-09-22 16:26:52 -0400
committerPatrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>2020-09-22 16:26:52 -0400
commitd6587211c02c4e2566c4e545c09757f3fbb7adab (patch)
tree5035066819fd8576ea18332ad6eb5ded6a1fd078
parentc4e4e163c79ca3fca265b85f44b869cb54e802b3 (diff)
downloadgcc-d6587211c02c4e2566c4e545c09757f3fbb7adab.zip
gcc-d6587211c02c4e2566c4e545c09757f3fbb7adab.tar.gz
gcc-d6587211c02c4e2566c4e545c09757f3fbb7adab.tar.bz2
c++: Return only in-scope tparms in keep_template_parm [PR95310]
In the testcase below, the dependent specializations iter_reference_t<F> and iter_reference_t<Out> share the same tree due to specialization caching. So when find_template_parameters walks through the requires-expression (as part of normalization), it sees and includes the out-of-scope template parameter F in the list of template parameters it found within the requires-expression (along with Out and N). From a correctness perspective this is harmless since the parameter mapping routines only care about the level and index of each parameter, so F is no different from Out in that sense. And it's also harmless that two parameters in the parameter mapping have the same level and index. But having both Out and F in the parameter mapping means extra work for hash_atomic_constrant, tsubst_parameter_mapping and get_mapped_args; and it also means we print this irrelevant template parameter in the testcase's diagnostics (via pp_cxx_parameter_mapping): in requirements with ‘Out o’ [with N = (const int&)&a; F = const int*; Out = const int*] This patch makes keep_template_parm return only in-scope template parameters by looking into ctx_parms for the corresponding in-scope one, through a new helper function corresponding_template_parameter. (That we sometimes print irrelevant template parameters in diagnostics is also the subject of PR99 and PR66968, so the above diagnostic issue could likely be fixed in a more general way, but this targeted fix to keep_template_parm is perhaps worthwhile on its own.) gcc/cp/ChangeLog: PR c++/95310 * pt.c (corresponding_template_parameter): Define. (keep_template_parm): Use it to adjust the given template parameter to the corresponding in-scope one from ctx_parms. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR c++/95310 * g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic15.C: New test.
-rw-r--r--gcc/cp/pt.c44
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic15.C16
2 files changed, 60 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
index 69946da..314bd03 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -10243,6 +10243,42 @@ lookup_and_finish_template_variable (tree templ, tree targs,
return convert_from_reference (templ);
}
+/* If the set of template parameters PARMS contains a template parameter
+ at the given LEVEL and INDEX, then return this parameter. Otherwise
+ return NULL_TREE. */
+
+static tree
+corresponding_template_parameter (tree parms, int level, int index)
+{
+ while (TMPL_PARMS_DEPTH (parms) > level)
+ parms = TREE_CHAIN (parms);
+
+ if (TMPL_PARMS_DEPTH (parms) != level
+ || TREE_VEC_LENGTH (TREE_VALUE (parms)) <= index)
+ return NULL_TREE;
+
+ tree t = TREE_VALUE (TREE_VEC_ELT (TREE_VALUE (parms), index));
+ /* As in template_parm_to_arg. */
+ if (TREE_CODE (t) == TYPE_DECL || TREE_CODE (t) == TEMPLATE_DECL)
+ t = TREE_TYPE (t);
+ else
+ t = DECL_INITIAL (t);
+
+ gcc_assert (TEMPLATE_PARM_P (t));
+ return t;
+}
+
+/* Return the template parameter from PARMS that positionally corresponds
+ to the template parameter PARM, or else return NULL_TREE. */
+
+static tree
+corresponding_template_parameter (tree parms, tree parm)
+{
+ int level, index;
+ template_parm_level_and_index (parm, &level, &index);
+ return corresponding_template_parameter (parms, level, index);
+}
+
struct pair_fn_data
{
@@ -10549,6 +10585,14 @@ keep_template_parm (tree t, void* data)
BOUND_TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARM itself. */
t = TREE_TYPE (TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARM_TEMPLATE_DECL (t));
+ /* This template parameter might be an argument to a cached dependent
+ specalization that was formed earlier inside some other template, in
+ which case the parameter is not among the ones that are in-scope.
+ Look in CTX_PARMS to find the corresponding in-scope template
+ parameter, and use it instead. */
+ if (tree in_scope = corresponding_template_parameter (ftpi->ctx_parms, t))
+ t = in_scope;
+
/* Arguments like const T yield parameters like const T. This means that
a template-id like X<T, const T> would yield two distinct parameters:
T and const T. Adjust types to their unqualified versions. */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic15.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic15.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3acd9f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic15.C
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// PR c++/95310
+// { dg-do compile { target concepts } }
+
+template <class T>
+using iter_reference_t = decltype(*T{});
+
+template <typename F>
+struct result { using type = iter_reference_t<F>; };
+
+template <class Out, const int& N>
+concept indirectly_writable = requires(Out o) { // { dg-bogus "F =" }
+ iter_reference_t<Out>(*o) = N;
+};
+
+const int a = 0;
+static_assert(indirectly_writable<const int*, a>); // { dg-error "assert" }