diff options
author | Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com> | 2020-09-22 16:26:52 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com> | 2020-09-22 16:26:52 -0400 |
commit | d6587211c02c4e2566c4e545c09757f3fbb7adab (patch) | |
tree | 5035066819fd8576ea18332ad6eb5ded6a1fd078 | |
parent | c4e4e163c79ca3fca265b85f44b869cb54e802b3 (diff) | |
download | gcc-d6587211c02c4e2566c4e545c09757f3fbb7adab.zip gcc-d6587211c02c4e2566c4e545c09757f3fbb7adab.tar.gz gcc-d6587211c02c4e2566c4e545c09757f3fbb7adab.tar.bz2 |
c++: Return only in-scope tparms in keep_template_parm [PR95310]
In the testcase below, the dependent specializations iter_reference_t<F>
and iter_reference_t<Out> share the same tree due to specialization
caching. So when find_template_parameters walks through the
requires-expression (as part of normalization), it sees and includes the
out-of-scope template parameter F in the list of template parameters
it found within the requires-expression (along with Out and N).
From a correctness perspective this is harmless since the parameter mapping
routines only care about the level and index of each parameter, so F is
no different from Out in that sense. And it's also harmless that two
parameters in the parameter mapping have the same level and index.
But having both Out and F in the parameter mapping means extra work for
hash_atomic_constrant, tsubst_parameter_mapping and get_mapped_args; and
it also means we print this irrelevant template parameter in the
testcase's diagnostics (via pp_cxx_parameter_mapping):
in requirements with ‘Out o’ [with N = (const int&)&a; F = const int*; Out = const int*]
This patch makes keep_template_parm return only in-scope template
parameters by looking into ctx_parms for the corresponding in-scope
one, through a new helper function corresponding_template_parameter.
(That we sometimes print irrelevant template parameters in diagnostics
is also the subject of PR99 and PR66968, so the above diagnostic issue
could likely be fixed in a more general way, but this targeted fix to
keep_template_parm is perhaps worthwhile on its own.)
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/95310
* pt.c (corresponding_template_parameter): Define.
(keep_template_parm): Use it to adjust the given template
parameter to the corresponding in-scope one from ctx_parms.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/95310
* g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic15.C: New test.
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/cp/pt.c | 44 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic15.C | 16 |
2 files changed, 60 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c index 69946da..314bd03 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/pt.c +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c @@ -10243,6 +10243,42 @@ lookup_and_finish_template_variable (tree templ, tree targs, return convert_from_reference (templ); } +/* If the set of template parameters PARMS contains a template parameter + at the given LEVEL and INDEX, then return this parameter. Otherwise + return NULL_TREE. */ + +static tree +corresponding_template_parameter (tree parms, int level, int index) +{ + while (TMPL_PARMS_DEPTH (parms) > level) + parms = TREE_CHAIN (parms); + + if (TMPL_PARMS_DEPTH (parms) != level + || TREE_VEC_LENGTH (TREE_VALUE (parms)) <= index) + return NULL_TREE; + + tree t = TREE_VALUE (TREE_VEC_ELT (TREE_VALUE (parms), index)); + /* As in template_parm_to_arg. */ + if (TREE_CODE (t) == TYPE_DECL || TREE_CODE (t) == TEMPLATE_DECL) + t = TREE_TYPE (t); + else + t = DECL_INITIAL (t); + + gcc_assert (TEMPLATE_PARM_P (t)); + return t; +} + +/* Return the template parameter from PARMS that positionally corresponds + to the template parameter PARM, or else return NULL_TREE. */ + +static tree +corresponding_template_parameter (tree parms, tree parm) +{ + int level, index; + template_parm_level_and_index (parm, &level, &index); + return corresponding_template_parameter (parms, level, index); +} + struct pair_fn_data { @@ -10549,6 +10585,14 @@ keep_template_parm (tree t, void* data) BOUND_TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARM itself. */ t = TREE_TYPE (TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARM_TEMPLATE_DECL (t)); + /* This template parameter might be an argument to a cached dependent + specalization that was formed earlier inside some other template, in + which case the parameter is not among the ones that are in-scope. + Look in CTX_PARMS to find the corresponding in-scope template + parameter, and use it instead. */ + if (tree in_scope = corresponding_template_parameter (ftpi->ctx_parms, t)) + t = in_scope; + /* Arguments like const T yield parameters like const T. This means that a template-id like X<T, const T> would yield two distinct parameters: T and const T. Adjust types to their unqualified versions. */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic15.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic15.C new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3acd9f6 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic15.C @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +// PR c++/95310 +// { dg-do compile { target concepts } } + +template <class T> +using iter_reference_t = decltype(*T{}); + +template <typename F> +struct result { using type = iter_reference_t<F>; }; + +template <class Out, const int& N> +concept indirectly_writable = requires(Out o) { // { dg-bogus "F =" } + iter_reference_t<Out>(*o) = N; +}; + +const int a = 0; +static_assert(indirectly_writable<const int*, a>); // { dg-error "assert" } |