diff options
| author | Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com> | 2023-11-25 03:42:04 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> | 2023-11-27 00:29:01 +0100 |
| commit | beb4328eaffc4817006d7b7bf52308aa780d106d (patch) | |
| tree | 3faf873e7ef5511b7795355643fdffbe3b56ab9c | |
| parent | b2f42d0cdf0c7eed9c4c55ccdd628836414136b1 (diff) | |
| download | gcc-beb4328eaffc4817006d7b7bf52308aa780d106d.zip gcc-beb4328eaffc4817006d7b7bf52308aa780d106d.tar.gz gcc-beb4328eaffc4817006d7b7bf52308aa780d106d.tar.bz2 | |
testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c:20: Fix XPASS for various targets
The xfail for "*-*-*" here, set in r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471
"tree-optimization/111294 - backwards threader PHI costing"
was somewhat too general and made this test XPASS for a
number of targets. The common factor for those targets is
that they either explicitly or by default define
LOGICAL_OP_NON_SHORT_CIRCUIT as 0 (see fold-const.cc).
Instead of changing *-*-* to a seemingly random set of
xfailed targets or inventing a new testsuite
effective-target predicate for logical-op-short-circuited
targets or the opposite, let's just force a setting that
removes the need for the xfail for all targets, by
overriding with --param=logical-op-non-short-circuit=0.
* gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c: Remove xfail for line 20. Pass
--param=logical-op-non-short-circuit=0. Comment why.
| -rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c | 5 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c index 3e544f3..1877d5d 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ /* { dg-do compile } */ -/* { dg-options "-Wuninitialized -O2" } */ +/* The param shuts up a bogus uninitialized warning at line 21. */ +/* { dg-options "-Wuninitialized -O2 --param=logical-op-non-short-circuit=0" } */ int g; void bar(); @@ -17,7 +18,7 @@ int foo (int n, int l, int m, int r) if (l > 100) if ( (n <= 9) && (m < 100) && (r < 19) ) - blah(v); /* { dg-bogus "uninitialized" "bogus warning" { xfail *-*-* } } */ + blah(v); /* { dg-bogus "uninitialized" "bogus warning" } */ if ( (n <= 8) && (m < 99) && (r < 19) ) blah(v); /* { dg-bogus "uninitialized" "pr101674" } */ |