aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>2022-04-29 15:01:12 -0400
committerMarek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>2022-05-04 16:06:02 -0400
commita733dea9e7c39352ce9f72059938833eaa819467 (patch)
treeccbeda72833e32500b8619ca0db65eea7c174725
parentc8df7208864d863f58da55d42ff82663059930b1 (diff)
downloadgcc-a733dea9e7c39352ce9f72059938833eaa819467.zip
gcc-a733dea9e7c39352ce9f72059938833eaa819467.tar.gz
gcc-a733dea9e7c39352ce9f72059938833eaa819467.tar.bz2
c++: wrong parse with functors [PR64679]
Consider struct F { F(int) {} F operator()(int) const { return *this; } }; and F(i)(0)(0); where we're supposed to first call the constructor and then invoke the operator() twice. However, we parse this as an init-declarator: "(i)" looks like a perfectly valid declarator, then we see an '(' and think it must be an initializer, so we commit and we're toast. My fix is to look a little bit farther before deciding we've seen an initializer. This is only a half of c++/64679, the other part of the PR is unrelated: there the problem is that we are calling pushdecl while parsing tentatively (in cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list), which is bad. PR c++/64679 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * parser.cc (cp_parser_init_declarator): Properly handle a series of operator() calls, they are not part of an init-declarator. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/parse/functor1.C: New test.
-rw-r--r--gcc/cp/parser.cc25
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/functor1.C22
2 files changed, 46 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
index 5fa743b..b52cbe1 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
@@ -22636,11 +22636,34 @@ cp_parser_init_declarator (cp_parser* parser,
return error_mark_node;
}
- /* An `=' or an `(', or an '{' in C++0x, indicates an initializer. */
+ /* An `=' or an '{' in C++11, indicate an initializer. An '(' may indicate
+ an initializer as well. */
if (token->type == CPP_EQ
|| token->type == CPP_OPEN_PAREN
|| token->type == CPP_OPEN_BRACE)
{
+ /* Don't get fooled into thinking that F(i)(1)(2) is an initializer.
+ It isn't; it's an expression. (Here '(i)' would have already been
+ parsed as a declarator.) */
+ if (token->type == CPP_OPEN_PAREN
+ && cp_parser_uncommitted_to_tentative_parse_p (parser))
+ {
+ cp_lexer_save_tokens (parser->lexer);
+ cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
+ cp_parser_skip_to_closing_parenthesis (parser,
+ /*recovering*/false,
+ /*or_comma*/false,
+ /*consume_paren*/true);
+ /* If this is an initializer, only a ',' or ';' can follow: either
+ we have another init-declarator, or we're at the end of an
+ init-declarator-list which can only be followed by a ';'. */
+ bool ok = (cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_SEMICOLON)
+ || cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_COMMA));
+ cp_lexer_rollback_tokens (parser->lexer);
+ if (__builtin_expect (!ok, 0))
+ /* Not an init-declarator. */
+ return error_mark_node;
+ }
is_initialized = SD_INITIALIZED;
initialization_kind = token->type;
declarator->init_loc = token->location;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/functor1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/functor1.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c014114
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/functor1.C
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+// PR c++/64679
+// { dg-do run }
+
+struct F {
+ F(int) { }
+ F(int, int) { }
+ F operator()(int) const { return *this; }
+ F operator()(int, int) const { return *this; }
+};
+
+int main()
+{
+ // Init-declarators.
+ int i = 0;
+ int (j)(1);
+ // None of these is an init-declarator.
+ F(i)(1)(2);
+ F(i)(1, 2)(3);
+ F(i)(1)(2, 3);
+ F(i)(2)(3)(4)(5);
+ F(i, j)(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6);
+}