diff options
| author | Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> | 2023-04-19 10:01:04 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> | 2023-04-19 10:01:04 +0200 |
| commit | 794ffdb0fb6312ce07af0bfc797bef9f4cff4c61 (patch) | |
| tree | 4102e49615e8d7d0b44f23627330107ce4e41eaf | |
| parent | cbddd574a78529b9176eb28253c20a335daefbb4 (diff) | |
| download | gcc-794ffdb0fb6312ce07af0bfc797bef9f4cff4c61.zip gcc-794ffdb0fb6312ce07af0bfc797bef9f4cff4c61.tar.gz gcc-794ffdb0fb6312ce07af0bfc797bef9f4cff4c61.tar.bz2 | |
testsuite: Fix up pr109524.C for -std=c++23 [PR109524]
This testcase was reduced such that it isn't valid C++23, so with my
usual testing with GXX_TESTSUITE_STDS=98,11,14,17,20,2b it fails:
FAIL: g++.dg/pr109524.C -std=gnu++2b (test for excess errors)
.../gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr109524.C: In function 'nn hh(nn)':
.../gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr109524.C:35:12: error: cannot bind non-const lvalue reference of type 'nn&' to an rvalue of type 'nn'
.../gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr109524.C:17:6: note: initializing argument 1 of 'nn::nn(nn&)'
The following patch fixes that and I've verified it doesn't change
anything on what the test was testing, it still ICEs in r13-7198 and
passes in r13-7203, now in all language modes (except for 98 where
it is intentionally UNSUPPORTED).
2023-04-19 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/109524
* g++.dg/pr109524.C (nn::nn): Change argument type from nn & to
const nn &.
| -rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr109524.C | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr109524.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr109524.C index a560839..644c757 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr109524.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr109524.C @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ struct _Guard { }; struct nn { int * _M_dataplus; - nn(nn &) + nn(const nn &) { f(); _Guard __guard; |