aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>2006-11-27 03:38:57 +0000
committerMark Mitchell <mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org>2006-11-27 03:38:57 +0000
commit56c7f9c1d073eb17e95c171e945bfabb322ca5f1 (patch)
tree8286b3f99f0ffc3955165946f34a9bbf324c1b16
parentf019376cf52c44761f3ad38ef7ea9f0465f30306 (diff)
downloadgcc-56c7f9c1d073eb17e95c171e945bfabb322ca5f1.zip
gcc-56c7f9c1d073eb17e95c171e945bfabb322ca5f1.tar.gz
gcc-56c7f9c1d073eb17e95c171e945bfabb322ca5f1.tar.bz2
re PR c++/29886 (Cast misinterpreted as variable declaration)
PR c++/29886 * parser.c (cp_parser): Add in_function_body. (cp_parser_new): Initialize it. (cp_parser_primary_expression): Use parser->in_function_body instead of at_function_scope_p. (cp_parser_asm_definition): Likewise. (cp_parser_direct_declarator): Likewise. (cp_parser_class_specifier): Clear parser->in_function_body. (cp_parser_constructor_declarator_p): Use parser->in_function_body instead of at_function_scope_p. (cp_parser_function_body_after_declarator): Set parser->in_function_body. PR c++/29886 * g++.dg/expr/cast8.C: New test. From-SVN: r119242
-rw-r--r--gcc/cp/ChangeLog15
-rw-r--r--gcc/cp/parser.c28
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog5
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/expr/cast8.C11
4 files changed, 53 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
index af4a3fc..095c2fe 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+2006-11-26 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
+
+ PR c++/29886
+ * parser.c (cp_parser): Add in_function_body.
+ (cp_parser_new): Initialize it.
+ (cp_parser_primary_expression): Use parser->in_function_body
+ instead of at_function_scope_p.
+ (cp_parser_asm_definition): Likewise.
+ (cp_parser_direct_declarator): Likewise.
+ (cp_parser_class_specifier): Clear parser->in_function_body.
+ (cp_parser_constructor_declarator_p): Use parser->in_function_body
+ instead of at_function_scope_p.
+ (cp_parser_function_body_after_declarator): Set
+ parser->in_function_body.
+
2006-11-21 Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor@gmail.com>
* cp-tree.def (STATIC_ASSERT): New.
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c
index c5dfea6..b6b1c97 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c
@@ -1390,6 +1390,10 @@ typedef struct cp_parser GTY(())
character set. */
bool translate_strings_p;
+ /* TRUE if we are presently parsing the body of a function, but not
+ a local class. */
+ bool in_function_body;
+
/* If non-NULL, then we are parsing a construct where new type
definitions are not permitted. The string stored here will be
issued as an error message if a type is defined. */
@@ -2634,6 +2638,9 @@ cp_parser_new (void)
/* String literals should be translated to the execution character set. */
parser->translate_strings_p = true;
+ /* We are not parsing a function body. */
+ parser->in_function_body = false;
+
/* The unparsed function queue is empty. */
parser->unparsed_functions_queues = build_tree_list (NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE);
@@ -2990,7 +2997,7 @@ cp_parser_primary_expression (cp_parser *parser,
int i = ({ int j = 3; j + 1; });
at class or namespace scope. */
- if (!at_function_scope_p ())
+ if (!parser->in_function_body)
error ("statement-expressions are allowed only inside functions");
/* Start the statement-expression. */
expr = begin_stmt_expr ();
@@ -10952,7 +10959,7 @@ cp_parser_asm_definition (cp_parser* parser)
too. Doing that means that we have to treat the `::' operator as
two `:' tokens. */
if (cp_parser_allow_gnu_extensions_p (parser)
- && at_function_scope_p ()
+ && parser->in_function_body
&& (cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_COLON)
|| cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_SCOPE)))
{
@@ -11018,7 +11025,7 @@ cp_parser_asm_definition (cp_parser* parser)
cp_parser_require (parser, CPP_SEMICOLON, "`;'");
/* Create the ASM_EXPR. */
- if (at_function_scope_p ())
+ if (parser->in_function_body)
{
asm_stmt = finish_asm_stmt (volatile_p, string, outputs,
inputs, clobbers);
@@ -11698,7 +11705,7 @@ cp_parser_direct_declarator (cp_parser* parser,
/* Normally, the array bound must be an integral constant
expression. However, as an extension, we allow VLAs
in function scopes. */
- else if (!at_function_scope_p ())
+ else if (!parser->in_function_body)
{
error ("array bound is not an integer constant");
bounds = error_mark_node;
@@ -13080,6 +13087,7 @@ cp_parser_class_specifier (cp_parser* parser)
int has_trailing_semicolon;
bool nested_name_specifier_p;
unsigned saved_num_template_parameter_lists;
+ bool saved_in_function_body;
tree old_scope = NULL_TREE;
tree scope = NULL_TREE;
@@ -13114,6 +13122,9 @@ cp_parser_class_specifier (cp_parser* parser)
saved_num_template_parameter_lists
= parser->num_template_parameter_lists;
parser->num_template_parameter_lists = 0;
+ /* We are not in a function body. */
+ saved_in_function_body = parser->in_function_body;
+ parser->in_function_body = false;
/* Start the class. */
if (nested_name_specifier_p)
@@ -13222,7 +13233,8 @@ cp_parser_class_specifier (cp_parser* parser)
/* Put back any saved access checks. */
pop_deferring_access_checks ();
- /* Restore the count of active template-parameter-lists. */
+ /* Restore saved state. */
+ parser->in_function_body = saved_in_function_body;
parser->num_template_parameter_lists
= saved_num_template_parameter_lists;
@@ -15388,7 +15400,7 @@ cp_parser_constructor_declarator_p (cp_parser *parser, bool friend_p)
/* The common case is that this is not a constructor declarator, so
try to avoid doing lots of work if at all possible. It's not
valid declare a constructor at function scope. */
- if (at_function_scope_p ())
+ if (parser->in_function_body)
return false;
/* And only certain tokens can begin a constructor declarator. */
next_token = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer);
@@ -15578,8 +15590,11 @@ cp_parser_function_definition_after_declarator (cp_parser* parser,
tree fn;
bool ctor_initializer_p = false;
bool saved_in_unbraced_linkage_specification_p;
+ bool saved_in_function_body;
unsigned saved_num_template_parameter_lists;
+ saved_in_function_body = parser->in_function_body;
+ parser->in_function_body = true;
/* If the next token is `return', then the code may be trying to
make use of the "named return value" extension that G++ used to
support. */
@@ -15633,6 +15648,7 @@ cp_parser_function_definition_after_declarator (cp_parser* parser,
= saved_in_unbraced_linkage_specification_p;
parser->num_template_parameter_lists
= saved_num_template_parameter_lists;
+ parser->in_function_body = saved_in_function_body;
return fn;
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 3adde52..f5cd43d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2006-11-26 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
+
+ PR c++/29886
+ * g++.dg/expr/cast8.C: New test.
+
2006-11-26 Kaveh R. Ghazi <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
* gcc.dg/torture/builtin-minmax-1.c: Test NaN in fmin/fmax.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/expr/cast8.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/expr/cast8.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9f1ce36
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/expr/cast8.C
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// PR c++/29886
+
+struct A {
+ static int x[1];
+};
+
+void foo(int i)
+{
+ if (int(A::x[i])) {}
+}
+