diff options
author | Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> | 2023-09-06 17:49:44 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> | 2023-09-06 17:49:44 +0200 |
commit | 3ad9948b3e716885ce66bdf1c8e053880a843a2b (patch) | |
tree | 03c66698124e1a76f69b18c758e17cb4ff1ba78e | |
parent | c62c82dc98dcb7420498b7114bf4cd2ec1a81405 (diff) | |
download | gcc-3ad9948b3e716885ce66bdf1c8e053880a843a2b.zip gcc-3ad9948b3e716885ce66bdf1c8e053880a843a2b.tar.gz gcc-3ad9948b3e716885ce66bdf1c8e053880a843a2b.tar.bz2 |
_BitInt profile fixes [PR102989]
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 03:14:32PM +0200, Jan Hubicka via Gcc-patches wrote:
> this patch extends verifier to check that all probabilities and counts are
> initialized if profile is supposed to be present. This is a bit complicated
> by the posibility that we inline !flag_guess_branch_probability function
> into function with profile defined and in this case we need to stop
> verification. For this reason I added flag to cfg structure tracking this.
This patch broke a couple of _BitInt tests (in the admittedly still
uncommitted series - still waiting for review of the C FE bits).
Here is a minimal patch to make it work again, though I'm not sure
if in the if_then_else and if_then_if_then_else cases I shouldn't scale
count of the other bbs as well. if_then method creates
if (COND) new_bb1;
in a middle of some pre-existing bb (with PROB that COND is true), if_then_else
if (COND) new_bb1; else new_bb2;
and if_then_if_then_else
if (COND1) { if (COND2) new_bb2; else new_bb1; }
with PROB1 and PROB2 probabilities that COND1 and COND2 are true.
The lowering happens shortly after IPA.
2023-09-06 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c/102989
* gimple-lower-bitint.cc (bitint_large_huge::if_then_else,
bitint_large_huge::if_then_if_then_else): Use make_single_succ_edge
rather than make_edge, initialize bb->count.
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc | 6 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc b/gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc index 3906c00..dceaec7 100644 --- a/gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc +++ b/gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc @@ -683,9 +683,10 @@ bitint_large_huge::if_then_else (gimple *cond, profile_probability prob, e1->flags = EDGE_FALSE_VALUE; e3->probability = prob; e1->probability = prob.invert (); + bb->count = e1->src->count.apply_probability (prob); set_immediate_dominator (CDI_DOMINATORS, bb, e1->src); set_immediate_dominator (CDI_DOMINATORS, e2->dest, e1->src); - edge_true = make_edge (bb, e2->dest, EDGE_FALLTHRU); + edge_true = make_single_succ_edge (bb, e2->dest, EDGE_FALLTHRU); edge_false = e2; m_gsi = gsi_after_labels (bb); } @@ -741,7 +742,8 @@ bitint_large_huge::if_then_if_then_else (gimple *cond1, gimple *cond2, e4->probability = prob2; e2->flags = EDGE_FALSE_VALUE; e2->probability = prob2.invert (); - e4 = make_edge (bb, e3->dest, EDGE_FALLTHRU); + bb->count = e2->src->count.apply_probability (prob2); + e4 = make_single_succ_edge (bb, e3->dest, EDGE_FALLTHRU); e2 = find_edge (e2->dest, e3->dest); edge_true_true = e4; edge_true_false = e2; |