diff options
author | David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com> | 2019-01-08 01:39:09 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | David Malcolm <dmalcolm@gcc.gnu.org> | 2019-01-08 01:39:09 +0000 |
commit | 44e813ecd1fa610e3e4ed2420a69d4a1e200b19c (patch) | |
tree | efb6f635b471253af58741b5fa04504fa3687786 | |
parent | ddb45008f2c9c040446e95ae0c8dfc2beca7b2b9 (diff) | |
download | gcc-44e813ecd1fa610e3e4ed2420a69d4a1e200b19c.zip gcc-44e813ecd1fa610e3e4ed2420a69d4a1e200b19c.tar.gz gcc-44e813ecd1fa610e3e4ed2420a69d4a1e200b19c.tar.bz2 |
Fix jit test case (PR jit/88747)
Amongst other changes, r266077 updated value_range_base::dump so
that it additionally prints the type. This broke an assertion within
the jit testsuite, in jit.dg/test-sum-of-squares.c, which was checking
for:
": [-INF, n_"
but was now getting:
": signed int [-INF, n_"
The test is merely intended as a simple verification that we can read
dump files via gcc_jit_context_enable_dump.
This patch loosens the requirements on the dump so that it should work
with either version of value_range_base::dump.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR jit/88747
* jit.dg/test-sum-of-squares.c (verify_code): Update expected vrp
dump to reflect r266077.
From-SVN: r267671
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-sum-of-squares.c | 2 |
2 files changed, 7 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index 72e9d8e..23de2ea 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2019-01-07 David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com> + + PR jit/88747 + * jit.dg/test-sum-of-squares.c (verify_code): Update expected vrp + dump to reflect r266077. + 2019-01-07 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR c/88701 diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-sum-of-squares.c b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-sum-of-squares.c index 46fd5c2..f095f41 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-sum-of-squares.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-sum-of-squares.c @@ -137,6 +137,6 @@ verify_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, gcc_jit_result *result) bounds of the iteration variable. Specifically, verify that some variable is known to be in the range negative infinity to some expression based on param "n" (actually n-1). */ - CHECK_STRING_CONTAINS (dump_vrp1, ": [-INF, n_"); + CHECK_STRING_CONTAINS (dump_vrp1, "[-INF, n_"); free (dump_vrp1); } |