diff options
author | Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> | 2025-04-15 14:56:30 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org> | 2025-04-15 14:56:30 +0200 |
commit | bf115fd45772de34cd24de02c41fdb175897f057 (patch) | |
tree | 81b5d9a34fb58e31caeba74c7d4deb2f45532f5f | |
parent | 07565115371ea5cdf9e6d75ea3777540d1d31bda (diff) | |
download | gcc-bf115fd45772de34cd24de02c41fdb175897f057.zip gcc-bf115fd45772de34cd24de02c41fdb175897f057.tar.gz gcc-bf115fd45772de34cd24de02c41fdb175897f057.tar.bz2 |
ipa-cp: Fix up ipcp_print_widest_int
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 03:34:07PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> This patch just introduces a form of dumping of widest ints that only
> have zeros in the lowest 128 bits so that instead of printing
> thousands of f's the output looks like:
>
> Bits: value = 0xffff, mask = all ones folled by 0xffffffffffffffffffffffffffff0000
>
> and then makes sure we use the function not only to print bits but
> also to print masks where values like these can also occur.
Shouldn't that be followed by instead?
And the widest_int checks seems to be quite expensive (especially for
large widest_ints), I think for the first one we can just == -1
and for the second one wi::arshift (value, 128) == -1 and the zero extension
by using wi::zext.
Anyway, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to use something shorter,
the variant patch uses 0xf..f prefix before the 128-bit hexadecimal
number (maybe we could also special case the even more common bits 64+
are all ones case). Or it could be 0xf*f prefix. Or printing such
numbers as -0x prefixed negative, though that is not a good idea for masks.
This version doesn't print e.g.
0xf..fffffffffffffffffffffffffffff0000
but just
0xf..f0000
(of course, for say mask of
0xf..f0000000000000000000000000000ffff
it prints it like that, doesn't try to shorten the 0 digits.
But if the most significant bits aren't set, it will be just
0xffff.
2025-04-15 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
* ipa-cp.cc (ipcp_print_widest_int): Print values with all ones in
bits 128+ with "0xf..f" prefix instead of "all ones folled by ".
Simplify wide_int check for -1 or all ones above least significant
128 bits.
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/ipa-cp.cc | 24 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-cp.cc b/gcc/ipa-cp.cc index 26b1496..379fbc5 100644 --- a/gcc/ipa-cp.cc +++ b/gcc/ipa-cp.cc @@ -313,14 +313,24 @@ ipcp_lattice<valtype>::print (FILE * f, bool dump_sources, bool dump_benefits) static void ipcp_print_widest_int (FILE *f, const widest_int &value) { - if (wi::eq_p (wi::bit_not (value), 0)) + if (value == -1) fprintf (f, "-1"); - else if (wi::eq_p (wi::bit_not (wi::bit_or (value, - wi::sub (wi::lshift (1, 128), - 1))), 0)) - { - fprintf (f, "all ones folled by "); - print_hex (wi::bit_and (value, wi::sub (wi::lshift (1, 128), 1)), f); + else if (wi::arshift (value, 128) == -1) + { + char buf[35], *p = buf + 2; + widest_int v = wi::zext (value, 128); + size_t len; + print_hex (v, buf); + len = strlen (p); + if (len == 32) + { + fprintf (f, "0xf..f"); + while (*p == 'f') + ++p; + } + else + fprintf (f, "0xf..f%0*d", (int) (32 - len), 0); + fputs (p, f); } else print_hex (value, f); |