aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>2024-06-17 19:24:05 +0200
committerJakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>2024-06-17 19:24:05 +0200
commitb63c7d92012f92e0517190cf263d29bbef8a06bf (patch)
treea1d27d4da1beb80d69d3fd7bfefe9748c76b9a28
parent8584c98f370cd91647c184ce58141508ca478a12 (diff)
downloadgcc-b63c7d92012f92e0517190cf263d29bbef8a06bf.zip
gcc-b63c7d92012f92e0517190cf263d29bbef8a06bf.tar.gz
gcc-b63c7d92012f92e0517190cf263d29bbef8a06bf.tar.bz2
c-family: Fix -Warray-compare warning ICE [PR115290]
The warning code uses %D to print the ARRAY_REF first operands. That works in the most common case where those operands are decls, but as can be seen on the following testcase, they can be other expressions with array type. Just changing %D to %E isn't enough, because then the diagnostics can suggest something like note: use '&(x) != 0 ? (int (*)[32])&a : (int (*)[32])&b[0] == &(y) != 0 ? (int (*)[32])&a : (int (*)[32])&b[0]' to compare the addresses which is a bad suggestion, the %E printing doesn't know that the warning code will want to add & before it and [0] after it. So, the following patch adds ()s around the operand as well, but does that only for non-decls, for decls keeps it as &arr[0] like before. 2024-06-17 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR c/115290 * c-warn.cc (do_warn_array_compare): Use %E rather than %D for printing op0 and op1; if those operands aren't decls, also print parens around them. * c-c++-common/Warray-compare-3.c: New test.
-rw-r--r--gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc13
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-3.c13
2 files changed, 22 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc b/gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc
index 7ddf6ea..5e4fb7f 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc
@@ -3832,11 +3832,16 @@ do_warn_array_compare (location_t location, tree_code code, tree op0, tree op1)
/* C doesn't allow +arr. */
if (c_dialect_cxx ())
inform (location, "use unary %<+%> which decays operands to pointers "
- "or %<&%D[0] %s &%D[0]%> to compare the addresses",
- op0, op_symbol_code (code), op1);
+ "or %<&%s%E%s[0] %s &%s%E%s[0]%> to compare the addresses",
+ DECL_P (op0) ? "" : "(", op0, DECL_P (op0) ? "" : ")",
+ op_symbol_code (code),
+ DECL_P (op1) ? "" : "(", op1, DECL_P (op1) ? "" : ")");
else
- inform (location, "use %<&%D[0] %s &%D[0]%> to compare the addresses",
- op0, op_symbol_code (code), op1);
+ inform (location,
+ "use %<&%s%E%s[0] %s &%s%E%s[0]%> to compare the addresses",
+ DECL_P (op0) ? "" : "(", op0, DECL_P (op0) ? "" : ")",
+ op_symbol_code (code),
+ DECL_P (op1) ? "" : "(", op1, DECL_P (op1) ? "" : ")");
}
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-3.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4725aa2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-3.c
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* PR c/115290 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Warray-compare" } */
+
+int a[32][32], b[32][32];
+
+int
+foo (int x, int y)
+{
+ return (x ? a : b) == (y ? a : b); /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" } */
+/* { dg-message "use '&\\\(\[^\n\r]*\\\)\\\[0\\\] == &\\\(\[^\n\r]*\\\)\\\[0\\\]' to compare the addresses" "" { target c } .-1 } */
+/* { dg-message "use unary '\\\+' which decays operands to pointers or '&\\\(\[^\n\r]*\\\)\\\[0\\\] == &\\\(\[^\n\r]*\\\)\\\[0\\\]' to compare the addresses" "" { target c++ } .-2 } */
+}