aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>2024-07-07 22:01:40 +0200
committerGerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>2024-07-07 22:01:40 +0200
commita28046e215307cf11c7a133c8b33dc0c0bcf74ec (patch)
treee22e039d9de875b0bfbee58f43d6820beddf9793
parent24cb586cafd40f8fbea68641f97e3431ea76c1b8 (diff)
downloadgcc-a28046e215307cf11c7a133c8b33dc0c0bcf74ec.zip
gcc-a28046e215307cf11c7a133c8b33dc0c0bcf74ec.tar.gz
gcc-a28046e215307cf11c7a133c8b33dc0c0bcf74ec.tar.bz2
doc: Remove dubious example around bug reporting
gcc: * doc/bugreport.texi (Bug Criteria): Remove dubious example.
-rw-r--r--gcc/doc/bugreport.texi5
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/doc/bugreport.texi b/gcc/doc/bugreport.texi
index b7cfb5d..7a60324 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/bugreport.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/bugreport.texi
@@ -50,11 +50,6 @@ However, you must double-check to make sure, because you may have a
program whose behavior is undefined, which happened by chance to give
the desired results with another C or C++ compiler.
-For example, in many nonoptimizing compilers, you can write @samp{x;}
-at the end of a function instead of @samp{return x;}, with the same
-results. But the value of the function is undefined if @code{return}
-is omitted; it is not a bug when GCC produces different results.
-
Problems often result from expressions with two increment operators,
as in @code{f (*p++, *p++)}. Your previous compiler might have
interpreted that expression the way you intended; GCC might