diff options
author | Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> | 2023-04-13 16:57:57 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> | 2023-04-13 16:57:57 +0100 |
commit | 66946624b96b762985de56444d726a0ebd4e0df5 (patch) | |
tree | 7e729782df46bdfe1821de3adac11686b1b58aa7 | |
parent | a37783de23c067d6a26374ff29c014e49604035c (diff) | |
download | gcc-66946624b96b762985de56444d726a0ebd4e0df5.zip gcc-66946624b96b762985de56444d726a0ebd4e0df5.tar.gz gcc-66946624b96b762985de56444d726a0ebd4e0df5.tar.bz2 |
aarch64: Don't trust TYPE_ALIGN for pointers [PR108910]
The aarch64 PCS rules ignore user alignment for scalars and
vectors and use the "natural" alignment of the type. GCC tried
to calculate that natural alignment using:
TYPE_ALIGN (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type))
But as discussed in the PR, it's possible that the main variant
of a pointer type is an overaligned type (although that's usually
accidental).
This isn't known to be a problem for other types, so this patch
changes the bare minimum. It might be that we need to ignore
TYPE_ALIGN in other cases too.
gcc/
PR target/108910
* config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_function_arg_alignment): Do
not trust TYPE_ALIGN for pointer types; use POINTER_SIZE instead.
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/108910
* gcc.dg/torture/pr108910.c: New test.
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 15 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr108910.c | 8 |
2 files changed, 22 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc index 42617ce..f4ef22c 100644 --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc @@ -7484,7 +7484,20 @@ aarch64_function_arg_alignment (machine_mode mode, const_tree type, gcc_assert (TYPE_MODE (type) == mode); if (!AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (type)) - return TYPE_ALIGN (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type)); + { + /* The ABI alignment is the natural alignment of the type, without + any attributes applied. Normally this is the alignment of the + TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT, but not always; see PR108910 for a counterexample. + For now we just handle the known exceptions explicitly. */ + type = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type); + if (POINTER_TYPE_P (type)) + { + gcc_assert (known_eq (POINTER_SIZE, GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode))); + return POINTER_SIZE; + } + gcc_assert (!TYPE_USER_ALIGN (type)); + return TYPE_ALIGN (type); + } if (TREE_CODE (type) == ARRAY_TYPE) return TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (type)); diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr108910.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr108910.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5973548 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr108910.c @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +extern void foo (float, float *, float *); + +void +bar (void *p) +{ + float *__attribute__((aligned (64))) q = __builtin_assume_aligned (p, 64); + foo (0.0f, q, q); +} |