ada: Add tags to warnings controlled by Warn_On_Redundant_Constructs

Some of the calls to Error_Msg_N controlled by the flag
Warn_On_Redundant_Constructs missed the "?r?" tag in their message
string. This caused a misleading "[enabled by default]" label to appear
next to the error message.

Spotted while adding a warning about duplicated choices in exception
handlers.

gcc/ada/

	* freeze.adb (Freeze_Record_Type): Add tag for redundant pragma Pack.
	* sem_aggr.adb (Resolve_Record_Aggregate): Add tag for redundant OTHERS
	choice.
	* sem_ch8.adb (Use_One_Type): Add tag for redundant USE clauses.

3 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/gcc/ada/freeze.adb b/gcc/ada/freeze.adb
index 990bace..6014f71 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/freeze.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/freeze.adb
@@ -5500,7 +5500,7 @@ package body Freeze is
 
             if Warn_On_Redundant_Constructs then
                Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
-                 ("??pragma Pack has no effect, no unplaced components",
+                 ("?r?pragma Pack has no effect, no unplaced components",
                   Get_Rep_Pragma (Rec, Name_Pack));
             end if;
          end if;
diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_aggr.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_aggr.adb
index b44708a..f1511b7 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/sem_aggr.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/sem_aggr.adb
@@ -5834,9 +5834,9 @@ package body Sem_Aggr is
                     ("OTHERS must represent at least one component", Selectr);
 
                elsif Others_Box = 1 and then Warn_On_Redundant_Constructs then
-                  Error_Msg_N ("OTHERS choice is redundant?", Box_Node);
+                  Error_Msg_N ("OTHERS choice is redundant?r?", Box_Node);
                   Error_Msg_N
-                    ("\previous choices cover all components?", Box_Node);
+                    ("\previous choices cover all components?r?", Box_Node);
                end if;
 
                exit Verification;
diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_ch8.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_ch8.adb
index 876dbac..212c13e 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/sem_ch8.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/sem_ch8.adb
@@ -10755,7 +10755,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch8 is
                      Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (Clause1);
                      Error_Msg_NE -- CODEFIX
                        ("& is already use-visible through previous "
-                        & "use_type_clause #??", Clause2, T);
+                        & "use_type_clause #?r?", Clause2, T);
                      return;
                   end if;
 
@@ -10827,7 +10827,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch8 is
 
                      Error_Msg_NE -- CODEFIX
                        ("& is already use-visible through previous "
-                        & "use_type_clause #??", Err_No, Id);
+                        & "use_type_clause #?r?", Err_No, Id);
                   end if;
                end Use_Clause_Known;
 
@@ -10837,7 +10837,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch8 is
             else
                Error_Msg_NE -- CODEFIX
                  ("& is already use-visible through previous "
-                  & "use_type_clause??", Id, T);
+                  & "use_type_clause?r?", Id, T);
             end if;
 
          --  The package where T is declared is already used
@@ -10852,7 +10852,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch8 is
                Error_Msg_Sloc :=
                  Sloc (Find_First_Use (Current_Use_Clause (Scope (T))));
                Error_Msg_NE -- CODEFIX
-                 ("& is already use-visible through package use clause #??",
+                 ("& is already use-visible through package use clause #?r?",
                   Id, T);
             end if;
 
@@ -10861,7 +10861,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch8 is
          else
             Error_Msg_Node_2 := Scope (T);
             Error_Msg_NE -- CODEFIX
-              ("& is already use-visible inside package &??", Id, T);
+              ("& is already use-visible inside package &?r?", Id, T);
          end if;
       end if;
    end Use_One_Type;